Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Jerry Aldridge, et al. v. Regions Bank
Date: 07-25-2025
Case Number: 21-CV-82
Judge: Clifton Leland Corker
Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee (Knox County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Knoxville Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney: John C. Neiman
Description:
Knoxville, Tennessee employment benefits law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an ERISA claim.
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
(ERISA) imposes many fiduciary duties on those who manage the retirement plans that
employers set up for their employees. ERISA generally allows employees who participate in
these plans to pursue breach-of-fiduciary-duty claims against these plan administrators. But the
law exempts retirement plans designed for high-level managers from its fiduciary-duty
requirements. It also directs employers to keep these so-called "top hat†plans unfunded, so
participating managers risk losing their benefits to an employer's creditors if the employer
becomes insolvent. This risk materialized for former managers of Ruby Tuesday, Inc., when the
company filed for bankruptcy. After losing their benefits, these managers sued Regions Bank—
the bank that had administered their top-hat plans. Unable to bring federal fiduciary-duty claims
under ERISA, the managers instead turned to state law. They asserted that Regions had
breached state-law fiduciary, trust, contract, and tort duties. Alternatively, the managers sought
to obtain their lost benefits from Regions under an ERISA provision that allows them to recover
only equitable (not legal) relief. These claims require us to ask both a preemption question and a
remedies question under ERISA.
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
(ERISA) imposes many fiduciary duties on those who manage the retirement plans that
employers set up for their employees. ERISA generally allows employees who participate in
these plans to pursue breach-of-fiduciary-duty claims against these plan administrators. But the
law exempts retirement plans designed for high-level managers from its fiduciary-duty
requirements. It also directs employers to keep these so-called "top hat†plans unfunded, so
participating managers risk losing their benefits to an employer's creditors if the employer
becomes insolvent. This risk materialized for former managers of Ruby Tuesday, Inc., when the
company filed for bankruptcy. After losing their benefits, these managers sued Regions Bank—
the bank that had administered their top-hat plans. Unable to bring federal fiduciary-duty claims
under ERISA, the managers instead turned to state law. They asserted that Regions had
breached state-law fiduciary, trust, contract, and tort duties. Alternatively, the managers sought
to obtain their lost benefits from Regions under an ERISA provision that allows them to recover
only equitable (not legal) relief. These claims require us to ask both a preemption question and a
remedies question under ERISA.
Outcome:
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Jerry Aldridge, et al. v. Regions Bank?
The outcome was: Affirmed
Which court heard Jerry Aldridge, et al. v. Regions Bank?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee (Knox County), TN. The presiding judge was Clifton Leland Corker.
Who were the attorneys in Jerry Aldridge, et al. v. Regions Bank?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Knoxville Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: John C. Neiman.
When was Jerry Aldridge, et al. v. Regions Bank decided?
This case was decided on July 25, 2025.