Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Associatation of Club Executives of Texas, et al. v. Ken Paxton, et al.
Date: 07-14-2025
Case Number: 21-CV-519
Judge: Robert Pitman
Court: United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (Travis County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: Micahel Murray, Benjamin Allen, Casey Wallace
Defendant's Attorney: Office of the Attorney General of Texas
Description:
Austin, Texas civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff challenging the Constitutionality of a Texas statute.
In 2021, the Texas Legislature enacted Senate Bill 315. Tex. S.B. 315,
87th Leg. R.S. (2021). Recognizing that sexually oriented businesses are
high-risk locations for human trafficking and sexual exploitation, S.B. 315
aims to "provide necessary mechanisms†to prevent the "harmful secondary
effects of sexually oriented businesses.†Senate Rsch. Ctr., Bill
Anal., Tex. S.B. 315, 87th Leg. R.S. (2021).
To do so, the bill raised the age of employment at sexually oriented
businesses ("SOBsâ€) from eighteen to twenty-one years old. See Tex. S.B.
315, 87th Leg. R.S. (2021). In Texas, an SOB is defined as a:
sex parlor, nude studio, modeling studio, love parlor, adult
bookstore, adult movie theater, adult video arcade, adult movie
enterprise the primary business of which is the offering of a
service or the selling, renting, or exhibiting of devices or any
other items intended to provide sexual stimulation or sexual
gratification to the customer.
Tex. Loc. Gov't Code Ann. § 243.002. Relevant here, S.B. 315
changed Texas laws regarding minors and SOBs in three ways.
First, S.B. 315 amended § 125.0015 of Texas's Civil Practice &
Remedies Code to provide that a person maintains a "common nuisance†by
"employing or entering into a contract for the performance of work or the
provision of a service with an individual younger than 21 years of age for work
or services performed†at an SOB.2 Tex. S.B. 315, § 5, 87th Leg. R.S. (2021)
(amending Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 125.0015(a)(19), (22)).
Second, S.B. 315 amended § 51.016 of the Labor Code such that,
generally, "[a] sexually oriented business may not employ or enter into a
contract . . . for the performance of work or the provision of a service with an
individual younger than 21 [18] years of age.†Tex. S.B. 315, § 6, 87th Leg.
R.S. (2021) (amending Tex. Labor Code § 51.016(b)) (formatting in original).
A violation of this section now constitutes a Class A misdemeanor subject to
a one-year jail sentence, administrative penalties, or a suit for injunctive relief
brought by the Attorney General of Texas. See Tex. S.B. 315, § 7, 87th Leg.
R.S. (2021); Tex. Labor Code §§ 51.016(i)(3), 51.031(b).
Third, S.B. 315 amended Texas Penal Code Section 43.251 by
changing the definition of "child†to mean "a person younger than 21 [18]
years of age.†Tex. S.B. 315, § 8, 87th Leg. R.S. (2021) (formatting in
original) (amending Tex. Penal Code § 43.251(a)(1)). Section 43.251
criminalizes "employment harmful to children.†Tex. Penal Code
§ 43.251(a)(1). Under that provision, "[a] person commits an offense if the
person employs, authorizes, or induces a child to work: (1) in a sexually
oriented commercial activity; or (2) in any place of business permitting,
requesting, or requiring a child to work nude or topless.†Id.
§ 43.251(b)(1)–(2). Similar to an SOB, a "sexually oriented commercial
activity†means a massage establishment, nude studio, modeling studio, love
parlor, or other similar commercial enterprise the primary business of which
is the offering of a service that is intended to provide sexual stimulation or
sexual gratification to the customer. Id. § 43.251(a)(5). Thus, Section 43.251
effectively makes it a felony to "employ[], authorize[], or induce[]†someone
under the age of 21 to work in or with an SOB.
* * *
In sum, Texas has established a reasonable belief that S.B. 315 furthers
a substantial state interest and that it permits reasonable alternative avenues
of communication. Appellants have failed to establish that S.B. 315 prohibits
or chills a substantial amount of protected speech. Thus, the district court
did not err in holding that S.B. 315 is constitutional under the First
Amendment.
In 2021, the Texas Legislature enacted Senate Bill 315. Tex. S.B. 315,
87th Leg. R.S. (2021). Recognizing that sexually oriented businesses are
high-risk locations for human trafficking and sexual exploitation, S.B. 315
aims to "provide necessary mechanisms†to prevent the "harmful secondary
effects of sexually oriented businesses.†Senate Rsch. Ctr., Bill
Anal., Tex. S.B. 315, 87th Leg. R.S. (2021).
To do so, the bill raised the age of employment at sexually oriented
businesses ("SOBsâ€) from eighteen to twenty-one years old. See Tex. S.B.
315, 87th Leg. R.S. (2021). In Texas, an SOB is defined as a:
sex parlor, nude studio, modeling studio, love parlor, adult
bookstore, adult movie theater, adult video arcade, adult movie
enterprise the primary business of which is the offering of a
service or the selling, renting, or exhibiting of devices or any
other items intended to provide sexual stimulation or sexual
gratification to the customer.
Tex. Loc. Gov't Code Ann. § 243.002. Relevant here, S.B. 315
changed Texas laws regarding minors and SOBs in three ways.
First, S.B. 315 amended § 125.0015 of Texas's Civil Practice &
Remedies Code to provide that a person maintains a "common nuisance†by
"employing or entering into a contract for the performance of work or the
provision of a service with an individual younger than 21 years of age for work
or services performed†at an SOB.2 Tex. S.B. 315, § 5, 87th Leg. R.S. (2021)
(amending Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 125.0015(a)(19), (22)).
Second, S.B. 315 amended § 51.016 of the Labor Code such that,
generally, "[a] sexually oriented business may not employ or enter into a
contract . . . for the performance of work or the provision of a service with an
individual younger than 21 [18] years of age.†Tex. S.B. 315, § 6, 87th Leg.
R.S. (2021) (amending Tex. Labor Code § 51.016(b)) (formatting in original).
A violation of this section now constitutes a Class A misdemeanor subject to
a one-year jail sentence, administrative penalties, or a suit for injunctive relief
brought by the Attorney General of Texas. See Tex. S.B. 315, § 7, 87th Leg.
R.S. (2021); Tex. Labor Code §§ 51.016(i)(3), 51.031(b).
Third, S.B. 315 amended Texas Penal Code Section 43.251 by
changing the definition of "child†to mean "a person younger than 21 [18]
years of age.†Tex. S.B. 315, § 8, 87th Leg. R.S. (2021) (formatting in
original) (amending Tex. Penal Code § 43.251(a)(1)). Section 43.251
criminalizes "employment harmful to children.†Tex. Penal Code
§ 43.251(a)(1). Under that provision, "[a] person commits an offense if the
person employs, authorizes, or induces a child to work: (1) in a sexually
oriented commercial activity; or (2) in any place of business permitting,
requesting, or requiring a child to work nude or topless.†Id.
§ 43.251(b)(1)–(2). Similar to an SOB, a "sexually oriented commercial
activity†means a massage establishment, nude studio, modeling studio, love
parlor, or other similar commercial enterprise the primary business of which
is the offering of a service that is intended to provide sexual stimulation or
sexual gratification to the customer. Id. § 43.251(a)(5). Thus, Section 43.251
effectively makes it a felony to "employ[], authorize[], or induce[]†someone
under the age of 21 to work in or with an SOB.
* * *
In sum, Texas has established a reasonable belief that S.B. 315 furthers
a substantial state interest and that it permits reasonable alternative avenues
of communication. Appellants have failed to establish that S.B. 315 prohibits
or chills a substantial amount of protected speech. Thus, the district court
did not err in holding that S.B. 315 is constitutional under the First
Amendment.
Outcome:
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Associatation of Club Executives of Texas, et al. v. Ken ...?
The outcome was: Affirmed
Which court heard Associatation of Club Executives of Texas, et al. v. Ken ...?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (Travis County), TX. The presiding judge was Robert Pitman.
Who were the attorneys in Associatation of Club Executives of Texas, et al. v. Ken ...?
Plaintiff's attorney: Micahel Murray, Benjamin Allen, Casey Wallace. Defendant's attorney: Office of the Attorney General of Texas.
When was Associatation of Club Executives of Texas, et al. v. Ken ... decided?
This case was decided on July 14, 2025.