Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Deangelus Thomas

Date: 07-03-2025

Case Number: 21-CV-20078

Judge: Jon Phipps McCalla

Court: United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee (Shelby County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in Memphis

Defendant's Attorney: Click Here For The Best Memphis Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory

Description:
Memphis, Tennessee criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with on two counts of being<br>
a felon in possession under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) for his role in a shooting.<br>
<br>
<br>
Thomas maintained that he could not be sentenced under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). Because he had never been indicted for it, and the jury had not found the essential fact —that he had three prior violent-felony convictions committed on different "occasions,” —he claimed he could only be subject to the penalties associated with § 922(g)(1). Otherwise, his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights would be violated.
Outcome:
A jury found the Defendant guilty.<br>
<br>
Throughout sentencing, Thomas maintained that he could not be sentenced under the<br>
Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). Because he had never been<br>
indicted for it, and the jury had not found the essential fact —that he had three prior violent-<br>
felony convictions committed on different “occasions,” —he claimed he could only be subject to<br>
the penalties associated with § 922(g)(1). Otherwise, his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights<br>
would be violated.<br>
<br>
The district judge disagreed. Following then-binding Sixth Circuit precedent, the judge<br>
found the fact of Thomas’s three prior convictions by a preponderance of evidence at sentencing,<br>
and imposed an enhanced, 432-month sentence on Thomas. We affirmed. But the Supreme<br>
Court later decided Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), which held that the Fifth and<br>
Sixth Amendments require a jury to find the three-occasions element of an ACCA conviction.<br>
<br>
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Deangelus Thomas?

The outcome was: A jury found the Defendant guilty. Throughout sentencing, Thomas maintained that he could not be sentenced under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). Because he had never been indicted for it, and the jury had not found the essential fact —that he had three prior violent- felony convictions committed on different “occasions,” —he claimed he could only be subject to the penalties associated with § 922(g)(1). Otherwise, his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights would be violated. The district judge disagreed. Following then-binding Sixth Circuit precedent, the judge found the fact of Thomas’s three prior convictions by a preponderance of evidence at sentencing, and imposed an enhanced, 432-month sentence on Thomas. We affirmed. But the Supreme Court later decided Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), which held that the Fifth and Sixth Amendments require a jury to find the three-occasions element of an ACCA conviction. Affirmed

Which court heard United States of America v. Deangelus Thomas?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee (Shelby County), TN. The presiding judge was Jon Phipps McCalla.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Deangelus Thomas?

Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in Memphis. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Memphis Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory.

When was United States of America v. Deangelus Thomas decided?

This case was decided on July 3, 2025.