Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of Aemrica v. Zachary Jon Lindsay
Date: 12-27-2024
Case Number: 21-CR-36
Judge: Dana L. Christensen
Court: United States District Court for the District of Montana (Missoula County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in Missoula
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Missoula Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory
Description:
Missoula, Montana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant in a revocation of supervised release proceeding.
Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Kathleen L. DeSoto's Findings & Recommendations Regarding Revocation of Supervised Release. (Doc. 71.) Because neither party objected, they are not entitled to de novo review. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Therefore, the Court reviews the Findings and Recommendation for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.†United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000).
* * *
Can supervised release be revoked for violations of its conditions, such as alcohol consumption and unlawful drug use?
Key Phrases Revocation of Supervised Release. Findings and Recommendations. Clear Error. Custodial Sentence. Substance Abuse Testing.
Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Kathleen L. DeSoto's Findings & Recommendations Regarding Revocation of Supervised Release. (Doc. 71.) Because neither party objected, they are not entitled to de novo review. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Therefore, the Court reviews the Findings and Recommendation for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.†United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000).
* * *
Can supervised release be revoked for violations of its conditions, such as alcohol consumption and unlawful drug use?
Key Phrases Revocation of Supervised Release. Findings and Recommendations. Clear Error. Custodial Sentence. Substance Abuse Testing.
Outcome:
Supervised release revoked.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States of Aemrica v. Zachary Jon Lindsay?
The outcome was: Supervised release revoked.
Which court heard United States of Aemrica v. Zachary Jon Lindsay?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Montana (Missoula County), MT. The presiding judge was Dana L. Christensen.
Who were the attorneys in United States of Aemrica v. Zachary Jon Lindsay?
Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in Missoula. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Missoula Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.
When was United States of Aemrica v. Zachary Jon Lindsay decided?
This case was decided on December 27, 2024.