Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Suzanne Jane Nagle v. Gene Murray Nagle
Date: 05-08-2025
Case Number: 20240260
Judge: Cynthia M. Feland
Court: District Court, Burleigh County, North Dakota
Plaintiff's Attorney: <center><h2><br> <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/northdakota/lawyers/bismarck/family_law.asp" target="_new"><h2>Click Here For The Best Bismarck Family Law Law Lawyer Directory</h2></a></font><br> </h2></center><br>
Defendant's Attorney: Click Here For The Best Bismarck Family Law Law Lawyer Directory
The parties were married and divorced twice. They first married in August 1982, and stipulated to a divorce in December 2018. They have two grown children. In December 2017, Gene Nagle had back surgery that left him disabled, and he pursued a medical malpractice action and an appeal of disability benefits. Neither action was completed when the parties first divorced. Under the terms of the first divorce, Gene Nagle received any proceeds from both claims. Gene Nagle settled the medical malpractice action but testified he could not disclose the amount he received. Gene Nagle receives disability benefits which will end in June 2025.
* * *
Legal issue Can a court treat two consecutive marriages between the same parties as a long-term marriage when determining equitable distribution in a second divorce?
Headnote
FAMILY LAW. DIVORCE AND PROPERTY DISTRIBUTION. The court addressed whether the equitable distribution of a marital estate under the Ruff-Fischer guidelines was clearly erroneous when treating a second marriage as a long-term marriage despite it being extremely short-term to justify equal property division.
PROCEDURAL LAW. APPEALABILITY OF IN LIMINE ORDERS. The court clarified that interlocutory orders, such as rulings on motions in limine, merge into the final judgment and can be appealed as part of that final judgment, allowing parties to challenge decisions made prior to trial.
PROPERTY LAW. RES JUDICATA IN DIVORCE PROCEEDINGS. The judgment explored res judicata principles, emphasizing that a prior divorce judgment does not control property divisions in subsequent divorces following remarriage, but all property, irrespective of its origin, becomes marital property upon remarriage.
FAMILY LAW. EFFECT OF REMARRIAGE ON PROPERTY DISTRIBUTION. The court considered whether the remarriage of parties necessitates revisiting and adjusting previous property distributions, ultimately concluding that remarriage creates a new marital estate subject to equitable distribution regardless of prior stipulations.
Key Phrases Equitable distribution of marital estate. Ruff-Fischer guidelines. Short-term marriage. Res judicata principles. Property division appeal.
About This Case
What was the outcome of Suzanne Jane Nagle v. Gene Murray Nagle?
The outcome was: Reversed and remanded.
Which court heard Suzanne Jane Nagle v. Gene Murray Nagle?
This case was heard in District Court, Burleigh County, North Dakota, ND. The presiding judge was Cynthia M. Feland.
Who were the attorneys in Suzanne Jane Nagle v. Gene Murray Nagle?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Bismarck Family Law Law Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Bismarck Family Law Law Lawyer Directory.
When was Suzanne Jane Nagle v. Gene Murray Nagle decided?
This case was decided on May 8, 2025.