Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
V.B. v. R.B.D.
Date: 08-08-2024
Case Number: 2024 NY Slip Op 51079
Judge: Not Available
Court: Supreme Court, Monroe County, New York
Plaintiff's Attorney: </center><center><br> <h2><br> <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/newyork/lawyers/rochester/divorce.asp" target="_new"><h2>Click Here For The Best Rochester Divorce Lawyer Directory</h2></a></font><br> </h2><br>
Defendant's Attorney: Click Here For The Best Rochester Divorce Lawyer Directory
Rochester, New York divorce lawyers represented the parties in a marriage dissolution case.
Here, "there is no question the parties have differing parenting styles" that at times cause conflict; however, there is not a sufficient alleged change in circumstances based on the totality of the circumstances. (Matter of Rosen v Rosen, 162 A.D.3d 1283, 1285 [2d Dept 2018]). The accusations, even as accepted as true, do not rise to a level sufficient to warrant subjecting the Children to the trauma and stress of further modification proceedings. (See David W. v Julia W., 158 A.D.2d 1, 6-7 [1st Dept 1990]; D.G., supra ["The change in circumstances threshold question is a necessary judicial safeguard to avoid subjecting families to unnecessary litigation and the ordeal of a hearing on the sensitive issue of custody."]). However, being cognizant of that conflict, the Court does find it appropriate to appoint a parenting coordinator to facilitate a productive dialogue between the parties to reduce the tension in this family for the benefit of the parents, and more importantly, the Children.
V.B. v. R.B.D., 2024 NY Slip Op 51079(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Aug 08, 2024)
About This Case
What was the outcome of V.B. v. R.B.D.?
The outcome was: Here, "there is no question the parties have differing parenting styles" that at times cause conflict; however, there is not a sufficient alleged change in circumstances based on the totality of the circumstances. (Matter of Rosen v Rosen, 162 A.D.3d 1283, 1285 [2d Dept 2018]). The accusations, even as accepted as true, do not rise to a level sufficient to warrant subjecting the Children to the trauma and stress of further modification proceedings. (See David W. v Julia W., 158 A.D.2d 1, 6-7 [1st Dept 1990]; D.G., supra ["The change in circumstances threshold question is a necessary judicial safeguard to avoid subjecting families to unnecessary litigation and the ordeal of a hearing on the sensitive issue of custody."]). However, being cognizant of that conflict, the Court does find it appropriate to appoint a parenting coordinator to facilitate a productive dialogue between the parties to reduce the tension in this family for the benefit of the parents, and more importantly, the Children. V.B. v. R.B.D., 2024 NY Slip Op 51079(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Aug 08, 2024)
Which court heard V.B. v. R.B.D.?
This case was heard in Supreme Court, Monroe County, New York, NY. The presiding judge was Not Available.
Who were the attorneys in V.B. v. R.B.D.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Rochester Divorce Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Rochester Divorce Lawyer Directory.
When was V.B. v. R.B.D. decided?
This case was decided on August 8, 2024.