Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Mirtanda Lananger v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental Protection and Catalyst Energy, Inc.

Date: 01-17-2025

Case Number: 2024-016-B

Judge: Beckman

Court: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board

Plaintiff's Attorney:



Click Here For The Best Harrisburg Administrative Law Lawyer Directory





Defendant's Attorney: Jean M. Mosites, Sean Keegan, Joshua Snyder, Kathy Condo

Description:
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania administrative law lawyer represented the Intervenor challenging the issuance of a permit to operate and injection well.



The Department issued the Permit on January 11, 2024 and a corrected permit was issued on January 17, 2024, including two additional conditions. (Joint Ex. 4) (Stip. at ΒΆ 13). Between February 15,2024 and February 26,2024, the Board received, via U.S. mail, thirty-eight individual appeals of the Permit. The majority of the appeals were consolidated under EHB Docket No. 2024-016-B on March 28, 2024 and the remainder of the appeals were eventually consolidated on April 18, 2024. On May 6, 2024, sixteen individuals, collectively, filed a petition to intervene and the Department subsequently filed an answer in opposition to their petition. On May 30, 2024, the Board issued an Opinion and Order granting the Intervenors' petition. As the case progressed, two appellants withdrew their appeals and ten intervenors discontinued their interventions.



* * *



Legal issue Can the appellants obtain a supersedeas to halt the conversion of an existing well into an underground injection well by showing a likelihood of prevailing on the merits of their appeal?



Key Phrases Department of Environmental Protection. Petition for Supersedeas. Injection Well. Mechanical Integrity Test. Environmental Hearing Board.
Outcome:
1. The Appellants' and Intervenors' Petition for Supersedeas is denied.



2. The temporary supersedeas granted by the Board's November 12, 2024 Order is lifted.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Mirtanda Lananger v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Depart...?

The outcome was: 1. The Appellants' and Intervenors' Petition for Supersedeas is denied. 2. The temporary supersedeas granted by the Board's November 12, 2024 Order is lifted.

Which court heard Mirtanda Lananger v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Depart...?

This case was heard in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board, pa. The presiding judge was Beckman.

Who were the attorneys in Mirtanda Lananger v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Depart...?

Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Harrisburg Administrative Law Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Jean M. Mosites, Sean Keegan, Joshua Snyder, Kathy Condo.

When was Mirtanda Lananger v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Depart... decided?

This case was decided on January 17, 2025.