Joyce Pierre v. Nicholas Damion Weir

Mineola, New York family law divorce lawyers represented parties in a dissolution of marriage.<br>
<br>
The parties were married in 2013 and there are no children of the marriage. The plaintiff commenced this action for a divorce and ancillary relief. The defendant interposed an answer with counterclaims. After the defendant failed to appear at trial on December 20, 2022, the Supreme Court conducted an inquest. Following the inquest, the court awarded the plaintiff a divorce pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 170(7). In an order entered December 20, 2022, made after the inquest, the court, inter alia, directed the defendant to remove the plaintiff's name from a mortgage on property located in Pennsylvania where the defendant resided.<br>
<br>
* * *<br>
<br>
Legal issue Can a party in a divorce proceeding have an order vacated for failure to appear at trial if they do not demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their absence?<br>
Headnote<br>
<br>
FAMILY LAW. DIVORCE PROCEEDINGS. The case involves an appeal against a judgment of divorce where the appellant challenged the denial of a motion to vacate an order due to failure to appear at trial, with the court addressing the issues of excusable default and the obligation to demonstrate a potentially meritorious defense.<br>
<br>
FAMILY LAW. VACATION OF DEFAULT JUDGMENTS. The court evaluated the appellant's claim to vacate a default judgment due to alleged fraud and misconduct without finding sufficient evidence to support the vacatur under CPLR 5015(a)(3).<br>
<br>
PROCEDURAL LAW. APPEALS. It was noted that the appeal from findings of fact and conclusions of law is non-appealable, and the appeal from an order is terminated upon the entry of a final judgment in the action.<br>
<br>
Key Phrases Judgment of divorce. Irretrievable breakdown. Matrimonial actions. Excusable default. Fraud and misconduct.

Affirmed