Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Charles R. Maples, et al. v. Compass Harbor Village Condominium Association, et al.
Date: 04-26-2022
Case Number: 2022 ME 26
Judge: Humphrey
Court: Supreme Court of Maine
Plaintiff's Attorney: Brendan P. Rielly
Defendant's Attorney: Richard Silver
Description:
Portland, Maine personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract and violation of the Unfair Trade Practices Act (UTPA).
Maples and Brown both own condominium units in the
twenty-four-unit Compass Harbor Village Condominium Association in Bar
Harbor. On July 22, 2019, the court entered a judgment in favor of Maples and
Brown, finding that the LLC was liable to them for breach of fiduciary duty and
that both the Association and the LLC were liable to them for breach of contract
and violation of the Unfair Trade Practices Act (UTPA). See 5 M.R.S. §§ 205-A to
214 (2022). The court awarded $134,900 to Maples and $106,801 to Brown to
compensate them for the "loss of real property rights, frustration, mental
anguish, devaluing of their condominium units, and loss of the enjoyment of
their condominium units.†Brown v. Compass Harbor Vill. Condo. Ass'n, 2020 ME 3
44, ¶ 10, 229 A.3d 158 (quotations and alterations omitted). The court also
entered an order of specific performance, requiring, among other things, that
Compass Harbor come into compliance with provisions of its bylaws and the
Maine Condominium Act. Id. ¶ 11
Compass Harbor appealed that judgment, and, on April 9, 2020, we
vacated the portion of the judgment on the UTPA claim, including the associated
award of attorney fees, as well as the portion ordering specific performance,
but we affirmed the judgment in all other respects.2 Id. ¶ 1. Following the
appeal, the court ordered Compass Harbor to pay Maples and Brown an
additional $243,170.38 in attorney fees. Maples and Brown allege that the
attorney fee award and the July 22, 2019, decision, as modified by us, together
constitute the final judgment.
Maples and Brown both own condominium units in the
twenty-four-unit Compass Harbor Village Condominium Association in Bar
Harbor. On July 22, 2019, the court entered a judgment in favor of Maples and
Brown, finding that the LLC was liable to them for breach of fiduciary duty and
that both the Association and the LLC were liable to them for breach of contract
and violation of the Unfair Trade Practices Act (UTPA). See 5 M.R.S. §§ 205-A to
214 (2022). The court awarded $134,900 to Maples and $106,801 to Brown to
compensate them for the "loss of real property rights, frustration, mental
anguish, devaluing of their condominium units, and loss of the enjoyment of
their condominium units.†Brown v. Compass Harbor Vill. Condo. Ass'n, 2020 ME 3
44, ¶ 10, 229 A.3d 158 (quotations and alterations omitted). The court also
entered an order of specific performance, requiring, among other things, that
Compass Harbor come into compliance with provisions of its bylaws and the
Maine Condominium Act. Id. ¶ 11
Compass Harbor appealed that judgment, and, on April 9, 2020, we
vacated the portion of the judgment on the UTPA claim, including the associated
award of attorney fees, as well as the portion ordering specific performance,
but we affirmed the judgment in all other respects.2 Id. ¶ 1. Following the
appeal, the court ordered Compass Harbor to pay Maples and Brown an
additional $243,170.38 in attorney fees. Maples and Brown allege that the
attorney fee award and the July 22, 2019, decision, as modified by us, together
constitute the final judgment.
Outcome:
Because the appeal is not taken from a final judgment and no
exception to the final judgment rule applies, we dismiss it as interlocutory.
exception to the final judgment rule applies, we dismiss it as interlocutory.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Charles R. Maples, et al. v. Compass Harbor Village Condo...?
The outcome was: Because the appeal is not taken from a final judgment and no exception to the final judgment rule applies, we dismiss it as interlocutory.
Which court heard Charles R. Maples, et al. v. Compass Harbor Village Condo...?
This case was heard in Supreme Court of Maine, ME. The presiding judge was Humphrey.
Who were the attorneys in Charles R. Maples, et al. v. Compass Harbor Village Condo...?
Plaintiff's attorney: Brendan P. Rielly. Defendant's attorney: Richard Silver.
When was Charles R. Maples, et al. v. Compass Harbor Village Condo... decided?
This case was decided on April 26, 2022.