Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States ex rel. Ganesa Rosales, etc. v. Amedisys North Carolina, L.L.C., et al.
Date: 02-18-2025
Case Number: 20-CV-90
Judge: James C. Dever III
Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina *New Hanover County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Wilmington Qui Tam Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney: Brian Kenneth French
Description:
Wilmington, North Carolina false claims act lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a qui tam claim.
The False Claims Act's first-to-file rule allows only one relator at a time to pursue
a False Claims Act claim related to a given fraud. Here, the district court dismissed the
case of Plaintiff-Relator, Ganesa Rosales, against Amedisys North Carolina, LLC, and two
other defendants, because another relator beat her to the punch by five years.
But Rosales argues that her claims were distinct from those in the earlier-filed
complaint. She contends, in part, that the district court erred by refusing to consider new
claims she asserted in an amended complaint.
In October 2014, nurse Jackie Byers began working for Amedisys Holding's South
Carolina subsidiary and noticed what she later alleged were "fraudulent practicesâ€â€”
namely, that Amedisys Holding was admitting and recertifying patients "for hospice care
who [did] not meet hospice requirements.†J.A. 12.1 Months later, on August 14, 2015,
Byers filed a qui tam complaint on behalf of the United States in the District of South
Carolina against Amedisys Holding and its South Carolina subsidiaries ("Original Byers
Complaintâ€).
The False Claims Act's first-to-file rule allows only one relator at a time to pursue
a False Claims Act claim related to a given fraud. Here, the district court dismissed the
case of Plaintiff-Relator, Ganesa Rosales, against Amedisys North Carolina, LLC, and two
other defendants, because another relator beat her to the punch by five years.
But Rosales argues that her claims were distinct from those in the earlier-filed
complaint. She contends, in part, that the district court erred by refusing to consider new
claims she asserted in an amended complaint.
In October 2014, nurse Jackie Byers began working for Amedisys Holding's South
Carolina subsidiary and noticed what she later alleged were "fraudulent practicesâ€â€”
namely, that Amedisys Holding was admitting and recertifying patients "for hospice care
who [did] not meet hospice requirements.†J.A. 12.1 Months later, on August 14, 2015,
Byers filed a qui tam complaint on behalf of the United States in the District of South
Carolina against Amedisys Holding and its South Carolina subsidiaries ("Original Byers
Complaintâ€).
Outcome:
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States ex rel. Ganesa Rosales, etc. v. Amedisys No...?
The outcome was: Affirmed
Which court heard United States ex rel. Ganesa Rosales, etc. v. Amedisys No...?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina *New Hanover County), NC. The presiding judge was James C. Dever III.
Who were the attorneys in United States ex rel. Ganesa Rosales, etc. v. Amedisys No...?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Wilmington Qui Tam Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Brian Kenneth French.
When was United States ex rel. Ganesa Rosales, etc. v. Amedisys No... decided?
This case was decided on February 18, 2025.