Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Bruce Charles Cohen v. Consilio, LLC and Consilio Services, LLC
Date: 10-06-2025
Case Number: 20-cv-01689
Judge: David S. Doty
Court: United States District Court for the District of Minnesota (Hennepin County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Minneapolis Employment Law Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Minneapolis Corporate Litigation Law Lawyer Directory
Description:
Minneapolis, Minnesota, employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a wage and hour law violation theory.
Consilio is a nationwide legal document review company with offices in
Minnesota. Cohen began working for Consilio in 2018 as an hourly licensed attorney
document reviewer. In July 2019, Consilio sent an email to Cohen and other
Minnesota-based hourly licensed attorney document reviewers, explaining that it
would be instituting a new premium overtime policy in August 2019. The new policy
eliminated overtime premium pay and clarified that Cohen and his fellow employees
would be paid "at [their] base pay rate†for all hours worked.
In August 2020, Cohen sued Consilio on behalf of himself and a putative
class, alleging that Consilio failed to pay overtime wages owed to him and similarly
situated employees. Cohen alleged that Consilio's actions violated the Minnesota
Payment of Wages Act (MPWA), Minn. Stat. Ann. §§ 181.101, 181.171, subd. 1;
Minnesota Fair Labor Standards Act (MFLSA), Minn. Stat. Ann. §§ 177.25, 177.27,
subd. 8; and Minnesota Wage Theft Act (MWTA), Minn. Stat. Ann. §§ 181.032(f),
(d)(4), 181.171, subd. 1, 177.27. As remedies, Cohen sought overtime pay,
liquidated damages, statutory penalties, and injunctive relief.
Consilio is a nationwide legal document review company with offices in
Minnesota. Cohen began working for Consilio in 2018 as an hourly licensed attorney
document reviewer. In July 2019, Consilio sent an email to Cohen and other
Minnesota-based hourly licensed attorney document reviewers, explaining that it
would be instituting a new premium overtime policy in August 2019. The new policy
eliminated overtime premium pay and clarified that Cohen and his fellow employees
would be paid "at [their] base pay rate†for all hours worked.
In August 2020, Cohen sued Consilio on behalf of himself and a putative
class, alleging that Consilio failed to pay overtime wages owed to him and similarly
situated employees. Cohen alleged that Consilio's actions violated the Minnesota
Payment of Wages Act (MPWA), Minn. Stat. Ann. §§ 181.101, 181.171, subd. 1;
Minnesota Fair Labor Standards Act (MFLSA), Minn. Stat. Ann. §§ 177.25, 177.27,
subd. 8; and Minnesota Wage Theft Act (MWTA), Minn. Stat. Ann. §§ 181.032(f),
(d)(4), 181.171, subd. 1, 177.27. As remedies, Cohen sought overtime pay,
liquidated damages, statutory penalties, and injunctive relief.
Outcome:
Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Bruce Charles Cohen v. Consilio, LLC and Consilio Service...?
The outcome was: Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Which court heard Bruce Charles Cohen v. Consilio, LLC and Consilio Service...?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Minnesota (Hennepin County), MN. The presiding judge was David S. Doty.
Who were the attorneys in Bruce Charles Cohen v. Consilio, LLC and Consilio Service...?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Minneapolis Employment Law Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Minneapolis Corporate Litigation Law Lawyer Directory.
When was Bruce Charles Cohen v. Consilio, LLC and Consilio Service... decided?
This case was decided on October 6, 2025.