Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Benjamin Joseph Herold v. Michael Christensen, et al.
Date: 08-08-2025
Case Number: 20-CV-00140
Judge:
Court: United States District Court for the District of Utah (Salt Lake County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Salt Lake City Personal Injury Law Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Salt Lake City Insurance Defense Law Lawyer Directory
Description:
Salt Lake City, Utah personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an excessive for claim.
Benjamin Joseph Herold, who suffers from mental illness, lost his right eye after he was shot in the face with pepper spray during an encounter with three St. George, Utah police officers in March 2019. Herold sued Sergeant Michael Christensen (the officer who pepper-sprayed him) and the City of St. George, alleging—as relevant here—that Christensen's conduct constituted excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment and the Utah Constitution. Christensen and the
City moved for summary judgment, arguing that Christensen is entitled to qualified immunity as to Herold's Fourth Amendment claim and that Herold's related state-law claim fails as a matter of law because the applicable law was not clearly established at the time of the incident.
Benjamin Joseph Herold, who suffers from mental illness, lost his right eye after he was shot in the face with pepper spray during an encounter with three St. George, Utah police officers in March 2019. Herold sued Sergeant Michael Christensen (the officer who pepper-sprayed him) and the City of St. George, alleging—as relevant here—that Christensen's conduct constituted excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment and the Utah Constitution. Christensen and the
City moved for summary judgment, arguing that Christensen is entitled to qualified immunity as to Herold's Fourth Amendment claim and that Herold's related state-law claim fails as a matter of law because the applicable law was not clearly established at the time of the incident.
Outcome:
Defendants' motion for summary judgment granted.
Affirmed on a qualified immunity theory.
Affirmed on a qualified immunity theory.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Benjamin Joseph Herold v. Michael Christensen, et al.?
The outcome was: Defendants' motion for summary judgment granted. Affirmed on a qualified immunity theory.
Which court heard Benjamin Joseph Herold v. Michael Christensen, et al.?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Utah (Salt Lake County), UT.
Who were the attorneys in Benjamin Joseph Herold v. Michael Christensen, et al.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Salt Lake City Personal Injury Law Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Salt Lake City Insurance Defense Law Lawyer Directory.
When was Benjamin Joseph Herold v. Michael Christensen, et al. decided?
This case was decided on August 8, 2025.