Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Evangelos Lohaitis, et al.

Date: 05-26-2026

Case Number: 2:25-cr-00133

Judge: William K. Sessions III

Court: United States District Court for the District of Vermont (Chittenden County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in Burlington

Defendant's Attorney:


Click Here For The Best Burlington Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory

Description:
Burlington, Vermont, criminal defense lawyers represent the Defendants charged with wire fraud.

Reported by Kent Morlan

Evangelos Lohaitis, a.k.a. “Bucky,” (36 – Saint-Eustache, Québec)
Mitchell Burnett-Guarna, a.k.a. “Juice,” (39 – Dorval, Québec)
Kyle Lesser, a.k.a. “Brock,” (34 – Notre-Dame-de-l’Île-Perrot, Québec)
Luca Santalucia, a.k.a. “Rocco,” (27 – Montreal, Québec)
Glen Crossley, a.k.a. “Buju,” (56 – Kirkland, Québec)
Cody Jodouin-King, a.k.a. “Lids,” (28 – Vaudreuil-Dorion, Québec)
Panagiota Fountotos, a.k.a. “Nike,” (29 – Laval, Québec)

The Defendants are alleged to have operation a Grandpart Scam involving phone calls made from call centers in and around Montreal, Québec. During these phone calls, defendants falsely claimed to be an elderly victim’s relative, typically a grandchild, who had been arrested following a car crash and needed money for “bail.” Other defendants posed as an “attorney” representing the elderly victim’s relative. Elderly victims were often told that there was a “gag order” in place to prevent the elderly victim from telling anyone about their family member’s supposed arrest. Elderly victims were convinced to provide bail money to an individual falsely posing as a bail bondsman, who would come to the elderly victim’s home to collect the money. This money was later transmitted to Canada following cash deliveries and financial transactions, sometimes involving cryptocurrency, which, the indictment alleges, obscured the source of the money and the identities of defendants.

The United States Attorney’s Office emphasizes that an indictment contains allegations only and that the defendants are presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty. The defendants face up to 20 years of imprisonment if convicted. The actual sentences, however, would be determined by the District Court with guidance from the advisory United States Sentencing Guidelines and the statutory sentencing factors.

First Assistant United States Attorney Jonathan A. Ophardt commended the investigatory efforts of Homeland Security Investigations, Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation, as well as Customs and Border Protection. First Assistant U.S. Attorney Ophardt also acknowledged the contributions of numerous other local, state, and federal investigators and agencies across the United States who assisted the investigation, and recognized the contributions of the United States Department of Justice’s Office of International Affairs as well as Justice Canada.

The prosecutors are Assistant United States Attorneys Nate Burris, Michelle Arra, and Nicole Cate. Santalucia is represented by David Sleigh, Esq. The other defendants have not yet retained or been appointed counsel in the United States.

This prosecution is part of the Homeland Security Task Force (HSTF) initiative established by Executive Order 14159, Protecting the American People Against Invasion. The HSTF is a whole-of-government partnership dedicated to eliminating criminal cartels, foreign gangs, transnational criminal organizations, and human smuggling and trafficking rings operating in the United States and abroad. Through historic interagency collaboration, the HSTF directs the full might of United States law enforcement towards identifying, investigating, and prosecuting the full spectrum of crimes committed by these organizations, which have long fueled violence and instability within our borders. In performing this work, the HSTF places special emphasis on investigating and prosecuting those engaged in child trafficking or other crimes involving children. The HSTF further utilizes all available tools to prosecute and remove the most violent criminal aliens from the United States. HSTF Vermont comprises agents and officers from Homeland Security Investigations, the FBI, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, the Diplomatic Security Service, the Internal Revenue Service-Criminal Investigation, and state and local partner agencies, with prosecutions being led by the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Vermont.
Outcome:
A criminal indictment is not proof of guilt.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Evangelos Lohaitis, et al.?

The outcome was: A criminal indictment is not proof of guilt.

Which court heard United States of America v. Evangelos Lohaitis, et al.?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Vermont (Chittenden County), VT. The presiding judge was William K. Sessions III.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Evangelos Lohaitis, et al.?

Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in Burlington. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Burlington Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.

When was United States of America v. Evangelos Lohaitis, et al. decided?

This case was decided on May 26, 2026.