Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Pedro E. Rodriguez, et al. v. General Star Indemnity Company

Date: 10-02-2024

Case Number: 2:24-cv-00219

Judge: John L. Badalamenti

Court: United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Lee County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:





Click Here For The Best Fort Myers Insurance Lawyer Directory







Defendant's Attorney: rmando Pedro Rubio

Description:



Fort Myers, Florida insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued on a bad faith breach of contract theory.



Outcome:
10/02/2024 28 TEXT ORDER. The parties have filed a Joint Status Report Regarding Settlement. (Doc. 27). Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice subject to the right of any party within thirty days to file another paper per Local Rule 3.09(b) or to move to reopen the case, which motion the Court would liberally grant. If no such papers have been filed within this thirty-day period, the dismissal of this case shall be with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is now DIRECTED to deny all pending motions as moot, terminate any deadlines, and close the case, subject to reopening if the parties file an appropriate motion within the thirty-day deadline set forth above. Signed by Judge John L. Badalamenti on 10/2/2024. (ACG) (Entered: 10/02/2024)

10/02/2024 29 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD) (Entered: 10/02/2024)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Pedro E. Rodriguez, et al. v. General Star Indemnity Company?

The outcome was: 10/02/2024 28 TEXT ORDER. The parties have filed a Joint Status Report Regarding Settlement. (Doc. 27). Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice subject to the right of any party within thirty days to file another paper per Local Rule 3.09(b) or to move to reopen the case, which motion the Court would liberally grant. If no such papers have been filed within this thirty-day period, the dismissal of this case shall be with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is now DIRECTED to deny all pending motions as moot, terminate any deadlines, and close the case, subject to reopening if the parties file an appropriate motion within the thirty-day deadline set forth above. Signed by Judge John L. Badalamenti on 10/2/2024. (ACG) (Entered: 10/02/2024) 10/02/2024 29 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD) (Entered: 10/02/2024)

Which court heard Pedro E. Rodriguez, et al. v. General Star Indemnity Company?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Lee County), FL. The presiding judge was John L. Badalamenti.

Who were the attorneys in Pedro E. Rodriguez, et al. v. General Star Indemnity Company?

Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Fort Myers Insurance Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: rmando Pedro Rubio.

When was Pedro E. Rodriguez, et al. v. General Star Indemnity Company decided?

This case was decided on October 2, 2024.