Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Dale Harvey v. Garann Rose Means
Date: 09-11-2024
Case Number: 2:23-CV-1712
Judge: Jamal N. Whitehead
Court: United States District Court for the Western District of Washington (King County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Seattle Family Law Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Seattle Family Law Lawyer Directory
Seattle, Washington Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of Child Abduction and International Child Abduction Remedies Act family law lawyers represented the parties.
* * *
Article 26 of the Hague Convention contains a fee-shifting provision that permits a court to award attorney fees and incidental costs to a successful petitioner. It states:
Upon ordering the return of a child or issuing an order concerning rights of access under this Convention, the judicial or administrative authorities may, where appropriate, direct the person who removed or retained the child, or who prevented the exercise of rights of access, to pay necessary expenses incurred by or on behalf of the applicant, including travel expenses, any costs incurred or payments made for locating the child, the costs of legal representation of the applicant, and those of returning the child.
Convention, art. 26.
4.1 The Court GRANTED in part Petitioner's motion for fees and costs. Dkt. No. 99.
4.2 The Court awardded Petitioner $85,472 in reasonable attorney fees and $1,409.69 in costs and expenses.
4.3 Petitioner is awarded post-judgment interest at the rate of 4.46 percent from the date of this Order to the date of satisfaction of the judgment.
4.4 The Court stayed enforcement of this fee and cost award until after the Ninth Circuit resolves Respondent's pending appeal.
About This Case
What was the outcome of Dale Harvey v. Garann Rose Means?
The outcome was: The Court found and ordered as follows: 4.1 The Court GRANTED in part Petitioner's motion for fees and costs. Dkt. No. 99. 4.2 The Court awardded Petitioner $85,472 in reasonable attorney fees and $1,409.69 in costs and expenses. 4.3 Petitioner is awarded post-judgment interest at the rate of 4.46 percent from the date of this Order to the date of satisfaction of the judgment. 4.4 The Court stayed enforcement of this fee and cost award until after the Ninth Circuit resolves Respondent's pending appeal.
Which court heard Dale Harvey v. Garann Rose Means?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Western District of Washington (King County), WA. The presiding judge was Jamal N. Whitehead.
Who were the attorneys in Dale Harvey v. Garann Rose Means?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Seattle Family Law Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Seattle Family Law Lawyer Directory.
When was Dale Harvey v. Garann Rose Means decided?
This case was decided on September 11, 2024.