Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Satira Stewart v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, et al.
Date: 09-07-2023
Case Number: 2:23-cv-02063
Judge: Susan O. Hickey
Court: United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas (Sebastian County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: Randon Lacy
Defendant's Attorney: Jessica Craft
Description:
Fort Smith, Arkansas employment law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement wrongful payment of benefits theories.
Before the Court is a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal. ECF No. 14. The parties stipulate that all claims asserted in this matter should be dismissed with prejudice. An action may be dismissed by "a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.†Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). "Caselaw concerning stipulated dismissals under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) is clear that the entry of such a stipulation of dismissal is effective automatically and does not require judicial approval.†Gardiner v. A.H. Robins Co., 747 F.2d 1180, 1189 (8th Cir. 1984). The instant stipulation of dismissal is signed by Plaintiff and Defendants. Thus, all claims in this matter were effectively dismissed when the parties filed the instant stipulation. However, this order issues for purposes of maintaining the docket. Accordingly, this case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with all parties to bear their own costs.
Before the Court is a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal. ECF No. 14. The parties stipulate that all claims asserted in this matter should be dismissed with prejudice. An action may be dismissed by "a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.†Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). "Caselaw concerning stipulated dismissals under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) is clear that the entry of such a stipulation of dismissal is effective automatically and does not require judicial approval.†Gardiner v. A.H. Robins Co., 747 F.2d 1180, 1189 (8th Cir. 1984). The instant stipulation of dismissal is signed by Plaintiff and Defendants. Thus, all claims in this matter were effectively dismissed when the parties filed the instant stipulation. However, this order issues for purposes of maintaining the docket. Accordingly, this case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with all parties to bear their own costs.
Outcome:
Dismissed with prejudice.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Satira Stewart v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Co...?
The outcome was: Dismissed with prejudice.
Which court heard Satira Stewart v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Co...?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas (Sebastian County), AR. The presiding judge was Susan O. Hickey.
Who were the attorneys in Satira Stewart v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Co...?
Plaintiff's attorney: Randon Lacy. Defendant's attorney: Jessica Craft.
When was Satira Stewart v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Co... decided?
This case was decided on September 7, 2023.