Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Frank Caldwell v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

Date: 02-06-2024

Case Number: 2:23-cv-00399

Judge: Nusrat Jahan Choudhury

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Nassau Count)

Plaintiff's Attorney: <center><br> <h2><br> <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/newyork/lawyers/centralislip/insuance.asp" target="_new"><h2>Click Here For The Best Central Islip Insurance Lawyer Directory</h2></a></font><br> </h2><br> </center>

Defendant's Attorney: Central Islip, New York insurance defense lawyer represented the Defendant.

Description:
Central Islip, New York insurance lawyer lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.



This case was filed in the Supreme Court State of New York, Nassau County, 617757/2022, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.



New York jurisprudence is clear that liability insurers owe their insureds the duty of good faith and fair dealing to act in their insureds best interests in defending and settling claims. This duty arises as implied covenants of the contract between the insurer and insured and includes the duty of thorough investigation of all claims and defenses that may be asserted for or against the insured. New York law does not generally recognize a tort action based on insurer bad faith. However, where the insurer fails to settle an action within the policy limits resulting in a judgement against the insured for a sum in excess of the policy limits, the insured may bring a direct action against the insurer for bad faith to recover the excess judgement above the policy limits. This is premised on the fact that the insurer has complete control over all claims handling and defenses asserted on behalf of the insured during the litigation proceedings. This right of action may be assigned by the insured defendant to the injured plaintiff allowing a direct action against the insurer for bad faith refusal to settle and if proven the injured party may recover the excess judgement above the policy limits from the insurer.
Outcome:
Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Frank Caldwell v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company?

The outcome was: Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.

Which court heard Frank Caldwell v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Nassau Count), NY. The presiding judge was Nusrat Jahan Choudhury.

Who were the attorneys in Frank Caldwell v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company?

Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Central Islip Insurance Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Central Islip, New York insurance defense lawyer represented the Defendant..

When was Frank Caldwell v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company decided?

This case was decided on February 6, 2024.