Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Nichole Robinette, et al. v. Globus Medical
Date: 01-30-2024
Case Number: 2:23-cv-00012
Judge: Howard C. Nielson, Jr.
Court: United States District Court for the District of Utah (Salt Lake County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Salt Lake City Personal Injury Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney: Salt Lake City, Utah insurance defense lawyer represented the Defendant.
Globus Medical is a leading medical device manufacturer with the goal of improving the quality of life for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. We are inspired by the needs of these patients and by the surgeons and healthcare providers who treat them.
The "Utah Product Liability Act."
78B-6-702 Definition -- Unreasonably dangerous.
As used in this part, "unreasonably dangerous" means that the product was dangerous to an
extent beyond which would be contemplated by the ordinary and prudent buyer, consumer, or user
of that product in that community considering the product's characteristics, propensities, risks,
dangers, and uses together with any actual knowledge, training, or experience possessed by that
particular buyer, user, or consumer.
Enacted by Chapter 3, 2008 General Session
78B-6-703 Defect or defective condition making product unreasonably dangerous --
Rebuttable presumption.
(1) In any action for damages for personal injury, death, or property damage allegedly caused by
a defect in a product, a product may not be considered to have a defect or to be in a defective
condition, unless at the time the product was sold by the manufacturer or other initial seller,
there was a defect or defective condition in the product which made the product unreasonably
dangerous to the user or consumer.
(2) There is a rebuttable presumption that a product is free from any defect or defective condition
where the alleged defect in the plans or designs for the product or the methods and techniques
of manufacturing, inspecting and testing the product were in conformity with government
standards established for that industry which were in existence at the time the plans or designs
for the product or the methods and techniques of manufacturing, inspecting and testing the
product were adopted.
78B-6-704 Prayer for damages.
No dollar amount shall be specified in the prayer of a complaint filed in a product liability action
against a product manufacturer, wholesaler or retailer. The complaint shall merely pray for such
damages as are reasonable in the premises.
78B-6-705 Alteration or modification of product after sale as substantial contributing cause
-- Manufacturer or seller not liable.
For purposes of Section 78B-5-818, fault shall include an alteration or modification of the
product, which occurred subsequent to the sale by the manufacturer or seller to the initial user or
consumer, and which changed the purpose, use, function, design, or intended use or manner of
use of the product from that for which the product was originally designed, tested, or intended.
About This Case
What was the outcome of Nichole Robinette, et al. v. Globus Medical?
The outcome was: Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.
Which court heard Nichole Robinette, et al. v. Globus Medical?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Utah (Salt Lake County), UT. The presiding judge was Howard C. Nielson, Jr..
Who were the attorneys in Nichole Robinette, et al. v. Globus Medical?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Salt Lake City Personal Injury Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Salt Lake City, Utah insurance defense lawyer represented the Defendant..
When was Nichole Robinette, et al. v. Globus Medical decided?
This case was decided on January 30, 2024.