Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Gwendolyn Wiggins v. Target Corporation
Date: 11-23-2022
Case Number: 2:22-cv-05996
Judge: Joanna Seybert
Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Nassau county)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan
Click Here For The Best Central Islip Personal Injury Lawyer Directory
If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer.
Defendant's Attorney: Allison C. Leibowitz
Description:
Central Islip, New York personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.
The elements of a personal injury claim are: (1) Failure on the part of the Defendant to exercise due care, (2) damages and/or injuries caused to Plaintiff, and (3) a direct casual relationship between 1 and 2.
The claims made and defenses asserted are not available.
Tort Law by Kent Morlan
Outcome:
11/23/2022 8 Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks: CIVIL CAUSE FOR INITIAL CONFERENCE. Counsel for Plaintiff: Henry Nachtman. Counsel for Defendant: Allison C. Leibowitz. Initial Conference Hearing held on 11/23/2022 at 9:00 AM. A scheduling order was not entered in light of the parties' filing under (DE 6 and DE 7 ) which seek remand based upon lack of subject matter jurisdiction. THE PARTIES ARE REMINDED that audio or video recording of proceedings by any party other than the Court is strictly prohibited by Local Civil Rule 1.8. Violation of this rule may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed appropriate by the Court. (FTR Log #9:07-9:09 (Video).) (DF) (Entered: 11/23/2022)
11/23/2022 9 ORDER granting 7 Motion to Remand to State Court; In light of the parties' stipulation which caps the amount in controversy of this action to a sum no greater than $75,000, the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to remand this case to Supreme Court, Queens County (ECF No. 7) is GRANTED and the Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 11/23/2022. (CV) (Entered: 11/23/2022)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Gwendolyn Wiggins v. Target Corporation?
The outcome was: 11/23/2022 8 Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks: CIVIL CAUSE FOR INITIAL CONFERENCE. Counsel for Plaintiff: Henry Nachtman. Counsel for Defendant: Allison C. Leibowitz. Initial Conference Hearing held on 11/23/2022 at 9:00 AM. A scheduling order was not entered in light of the parties' filing under (DE 6 and DE 7 ) which seek remand based upon lack of subject matter jurisdiction. THE PARTIES ARE REMINDED that audio or video recording of proceedings by any party other than the Court is strictly prohibited by Local Civil Rule 1.8. Violation of this rule may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed appropriate by the Court. (FTR Log #9:07-9:09 (Video).) (DF) (Entered: 11/23/2022)
11/23/2022 9 ORDER granting 7 Motion to Remand to State Court; In light of the parties' stipulation which caps the amount in controversy of this action to a sum no greater than $75,000, the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to remand this case to Supreme Court, Queens County (ECF No. 7) is GRANTED and the Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 11/23/2022. (CV) (Entered: 11/23/2022)
Which court heard Gwendolyn Wiggins v. Target Corporation?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Nassau county), NY. The presiding judge was Joanna Seybert.
Who were the attorneys in Gwendolyn Wiggins v. Target Corporation?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan
Click Here For The Best Central Islip Personal Injury Lawyer Directory
If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer.. Defendant's attorney: Allison C. Leibowitz.
When was Gwendolyn Wiggins v. Target Corporation decided?
This case was decided on November 23, 2022.
Defendant's Attorney: Allison C. Leibowitz
The elements of a personal injury claim are: (1) Failure on the part of the Defendant to exercise due care, (2) damages and/or injuries caused to Plaintiff, and (3) a direct casual relationship between 1 and 2.
The claims made and defenses asserted are not available.
Tort Law by Kent Morlan
Tort Law by Kent Morlan
11/23/2022 9 ORDER granting 7 Motion to Remand to State Court; In light of the parties' stipulation which caps the amount in controversy of this action to a sum no greater than $75,000, the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to remand this case to Supreme Court, Queens County (ECF No. 7) is GRANTED and the Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 11/23/2022. (CV) (Entered: 11/23/2022)
About This Case
What was the outcome of Gwendolyn Wiggins v. Target Corporation?
The outcome was: 11/23/2022 8 Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks: CIVIL CAUSE FOR INITIAL CONFERENCE. Counsel for Plaintiff: Henry Nachtman. Counsel for Defendant: Allison C. Leibowitz. Initial Conference Hearing held on 11/23/2022 at 9:00 AM. A scheduling order was not entered in light of the parties' filing under (DE 6 and DE 7 ) which seek remand based upon lack of subject matter jurisdiction. THE PARTIES ARE REMINDED that audio or video recording of proceedings by any party other than the Court is strictly prohibited by Local Civil Rule 1.8. Violation of this rule may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed appropriate by the Court. (FTR Log #9:07-9:09 (Video).) (DF) (Entered: 11/23/2022) 11/23/2022 9 ORDER granting 7 Motion to Remand to State Court; In light of the parties' stipulation which caps the amount in controversy of this action to a sum no greater than $75,000, the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to remand this case to Supreme Court, Queens County (ECF No. 7) is GRANTED and the Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 11/23/2022. (CV) (Entered: 11/23/2022)
Which court heard Gwendolyn Wiggins v. Target Corporation?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Nassau county), NY. The presiding judge was Joanna Seybert.
Who were the attorneys in Gwendolyn Wiggins v. Target Corporation?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan Click Here For The Best Central Islip Personal Injury Lawyer Directory If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer.. Defendant's attorney: Allison C. Leibowitz.
When was Gwendolyn Wiggins v. Target Corporation decided?
This case was decided on November 23, 2022.