Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

TuWanna Thompson v. Karen Civil and Christian Emiliano

Date: 10-13-2021

Case Number: 2:19-cv-05690-RSWL-AS

Judge: Ronald S.W. Lew

Court: United States District Court for the Central District of California (Los Angles County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:

Best Los Angeles Personal Injury Lawyer Directory

Defendant's Attorney: Nathalie Meza Contreras and Walter Mosley

Description:

Los Angeles, CA: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on assault, libel and slander theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of the wrongful conduct of the Defendants.

Outcome:

10/13/2021 72 ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 68 filed by TuWanna Thompson. CCA # 20-55955. The opening brief submitted on September 27, 2021 is filed. [See Order for further details] (car) (Entered: 10/14/2021)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of TuWanna Thompson v. Karen Civil and Christian Emiliano?

The outcome was: 10/13/2021 72 ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 68 filed by TuWanna Thompson. CCA # 20-55955. The opening brief submitted on September 27, 2021 is filed. [See Order for further details] (car) (Entered: 10/14/2021)

Which court heard TuWanna Thompson v. Karen Civil and Christian Emiliano?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Central District of California (Los Angles County), ca. The presiding judge was Ronald S.W. Lew.

Who were the attorneys in TuWanna Thompson v. Karen Civil and Christian Emiliano?

Plaintiff's attorney: Best Los Angeles Personal Injury Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Nathalie Meza Contreras and Walter Mosley.

When was TuWanna Thompson v. Karen Civil and Christian Emiliano decided?

This case was decided on October 13, 2021.