Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Kelly R. Ramsey v. Nathaniel Ryan Sloan and Golden Manufacturing, Inc.
Date: 09-20-2019
Case Number: 2:17-cv-02319-BHH
Judge: Bruce Howe Hendricks
Court: United States District Court for the District of South Carolina (Charleston County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Call 888-354-4529 if you need help finding a plaintiff personal injury truck wreck lawyer in Charleston or Walterboro, South Carolina
Defendant's Attorney: Morgan S Templeton, William Wharton Watkins, Jr. and Ford Hamby Thrift
MoreLaw Legal Marketing Services
The Better Way To Market Your Services On The Internet
Call: 888-354-4592 Today!
Charleston, SC - Kelly R. Ramsey sued Nathaniel Ryan Sloan and Golden Manufacturing, Inc. on personal injury, auto negligence and respondeat superior theories claiming to have been injured and/or damaged in a car truck wreck caused by Sloan.
About This Case
What was the outcome of Kelly R. Ramsey v. Nathaniel Ryan Sloan and Golden Manufa...?
The outcome was: 09/20/2019 53 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without costs and without prejudice to the right of either party, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, to reinstate the action if settlement is not consummated. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 9/20/2019. (vdru, ) (Entered: 09/20/2019)
Which court heard Kelly R. Ramsey v. Nathaniel Ryan Sloan and Golden Manufa...?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of South Carolina (Charleston County), SC. The presiding judge was Bruce Howe Hendricks.
Who were the attorneys in Kelly R. Ramsey v. Nathaniel Ryan Sloan and Golden Manufa...?
Plaintiff's attorney: Call 888-354-4529 if you need help finding a plaintiff personal injury truck wreck lawyer in Charleston or Walterboro, South Carolina. Defendant's attorney: Morgan S Templeton, William Wharton Watkins, Jr. and Ford Hamby Thrift.
When was Kelly R. Ramsey v. Nathaniel Ryan Sloan and Golden Manufa... decided?
This case was decided on September 20, 2019.