Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
State of Oregon v. Ramon Amador-Hernandez
Date: 03-06-2025
Case Number: 19CR56998
Judge: Jerry B. Hodson
Court: Circuit Court, Multnomah County, Oregon
Plaintiff's Attorney: Multnomah County, Oregon District Attorney's Office
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Portland Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory
Click Here For The Best Portland Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory
Description:
Porland, Oregon criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with two counts of first-degree criminal mistreatment, ORS 163.205, and a second judgment convicting him of five counts of first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427.
The state charged defendant with first-degree criminal mistreatment of each of his two daughters, G and T Following the state's presentation of evidence, defendant moved for judgment of acquittal on both counts. The trial court denied the motion and found defendant guilty of both counts, explaining that the state presented evidence sufficient to conclude that defendant "knowingly withheld necessary and adequate food and dental care from [G] and [T] and that these conditions caused or were likely to cause serious physical injury."
* * *
Legal issue Can video statements made during an evaluation for medical diagnosis or treatment be admitted as evidence, even if the declarant questions the necessity of the examination?
Key Phrases First-degree criminal mistreatment. First-degree sexual abuse. Motion for judgment of acquittal. Hearsay statements. Medical diagnosis or treatment.
The state charged defendant with first-degree criminal mistreatment of each of his two daughters, G and T Following the state's presentation of evidence, defendant moved for judgment of acquittal on both counts. The trial court denied the motion and found defendant guilty of both counts, explaining that the state presented evidence sufficient to conclude that defendant "knowingly withheld necessary and adequate food and dental care from [G] and [T] and that these conditions caused or were likely to cause serious physical injury."
* * *
Legal issue Can video statements made during an evaluation for medical diagnosis or treatment be admitted as evidence, even if the declarant questions the necessity of the examination?
Key Phrases First-degree criminal mistreatment. First-degree sexual abuse. Motion for judgment of acquittal. Hearsay statements. Medical diagnosis or treatment.
Outcome:
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of State of Oregon v. Ramon Amador-Hernandez?
The outcome was: Affirmed
Which court heard State of Oregon v. Ramon Amador-Hernandez?
This case was heard in Circuit Court, Multnomah County, Oregon, OR. The presiding judge was Jerry B. Hodson.
Who were the attorneys in State of Oregon v. Ramon Amador-Hernandez?
Plaintiff's attorney: Multnomah County, Oregon District Attorney's Office. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Portland Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.
When was State of Oregon v. Ramon Amador-Hernandez decided?
This case was decided on March 6, 2025.