Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of America v. Andrew raphael Reese
Date: 05-13-2025
Case Number: 19-CR-144
Judge: RM
Court: United States District Court for the District of Colorado (Denver County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney in Denver
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Denver Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory
Description:
Denver, Colorado criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with felony possession of a firearm.
MoreLaw was created to help people find experienced lawyers to represent them in the more than 3,144 counties across the United States. Click the link above to see a list of lawyers ready and willing to represent you if you have a legal problem and need help. Call: 918-582-6422 for help.
Defendant, Andrew Reese, pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm and mmunition as a felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). In relevant part, § 922(g)(1) makes it unlawful for a convicted felon to "possess in or affecting
commerce, any firearm.†Defendant also admitted to violating the terms of his supervised release by possessing a firearm and by failing to participate in substance abuse testing.In consolidated appeals,
Defendant challenged his § 922(g)(1)conviction (No. 24-1070) and his revocation sentence (No. 24-1069) by arguing
§ 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment and the Commerce Clause.
MoreLaw was created to help people find experienced lawyers to represent them in the more than 3,144 counties across the United States. Click the link above to see a list of lawyers ready and willing to represent you if you have a legal problem and need help. Call: 918-582-6422 for help.
Defendant, Andrew Reese, pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm and mmunition as a felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). In relevant part, § 922(g)(1) makes it unlawful for a convicted felon to "possess in or affecting
commerce, any firearm.†Defendant also admitted to violating the terms of his supervised release by possessing a firearm and by failing to participate in substance abuse testing.In consolidated appeals,
Defendant challenged his § 922(g)(1)conviction (No. 24-1070) and his revocation sentence (No. 24-1069) by arguing
§ 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment and the Commerce Clause.
Outcome:
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States of America v. Andrew raphael Reese?
The outcome was: Affirmed
Which court heard United States of America v. Andrew raphael Reese?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Colorado (Denver County), CO. The presiding judge was RM.
Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Andrew raphael Reese?
Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney in Denver. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Denver Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory.
When was United States of America v. Andrew raphael Reese decided?
This case was decided on May 13, 2025.