Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
M.S. v. Nour Eddine Mouktabis
Date: 11-20-2024
Case Number: 18PO11790
Judge: Kathie F. Steele
Court: Circuit Court, Clackamas County, Oregon
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Oregon City Family Law Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Oregon City Family Law Lawyer Directory
Description:
Petitioner obtained a Family Abuse Protection Act (FAPA) restraining order against respondent, her then-husband, in 2018. The restraining order came up for renewal a year later, the trial court dismissed it, a stay was issued pending appeal, and the order was dismissed with finality in January 2021. Meanwhile, immediately before it came up for renewal, respondent moved to set aside the restraining order under ORCP 71 B, based on fraud, misrepresentation, and newly discovered evidence. After appeal-related delays, a hearing was held on the ORCP 71 B motion in September 2021. The trial court denied the motion. Respondent appeals, arguing that he was entitled to relief under ORCP 71 B(1)(b), (c), and (e).
M. A. v. Mouktabis, 336 Or.App. 332, A177857 (Or. App. Nov 20, 2024)
Oregon City, Oregon family law lawyers represented the parties in a Family Abuse Protection Act (FAPA) restraining order action.
Petitioner obtained a Family Abuse Protection Act (FAPA) restraining order against respondent, her then-husband, in 2018. The restraining order came up for renewal a year later, the trial court dismissed it, a stay was issued pending appeal, and the order was dismissed with finality in January 2021. Meanwhile, immediately before it came up for renewal, respondent moved to set aside the restraining order under ORCP 71 B, based on fraud, misrepresentation, and newly discovered evidence. After appeal-related delays, a hearing was held on the ORCP 71 B motion in September 2021. The trial court denied the motion. Respondent appeals, arguing that he was entitled to relief under ORCP 71 B(1)(b), (c), and (e).
M. A. v. Mouktabis, 336 Or.App. 332, A177857 (Or. App. Nov 20, 2024)
Outcome:
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of M.S. v. Nour Eddine Mouktabis?
The outcome was: Affirmed
Which court heard M.S. v. Nour Eddine Mouktabis?
This case was heard in Circuit Court, Clackamas County, Oregon, OR. The presiding judge was Kathie F. Steele.
Who were the attorneys in M.S. v. Nour Eddine Mouktabis?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Oregon City Family Law Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Oregon City Family Law Lawyer Directory.
When was M.S. v. Nour Eddine Mouktabis decided?
This case was decided on November 20, 2024.