Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Grace P. Irwin v. Commerce Bancshares v. Central Bank of Kansas City
Date: 11-13-2000
Case Number: 16CV99-01968
Judge: John R. O'Malley
Court: 16th Circuit Court, Jackson County, Missouri
Plaintiff's Attorney: Matthew S. Jensen, Kansas City, Missouri
Defendant's Attorney: James R. Borthwick, Kansas City, Missouri and William F. Logan, Topeka, Kansas for Central Bank of Kansas City, Missouri
Plaintiff claimed the value of the stock plus dividends, prejudgment interest, attorney's fees and punitive damages. ($36,208.13 stock value and dividends, $8,553.02 prejudgment interest and $47,184.30 in attorney's fees and expenses.)
Immediately after the verdict, the Court reduced the damages awarded by 50% to $22,380.58. The Court then awarded $19,607.50 in attorney's fees and costs. (Central Bank to pay $27,291.87 and Commerce Bancshares to pay $14,696.20). Plaintiff's punitive damage claim was dismissed by the Court before the trial began.
E-mail suggested additions, corrections and/or comments about this case to verdicts@morelaw.com.
About This Case
What was the outcome of Grace P. Irwin v. Commerce Bancshares v. Central Bank of ...?
The outcome was: Plaintiff's verdict for $36,208.13 plus $8,553.02 prejudgment interest against Commerce Bancshares. Central Bank found 65% at fault, Commerce Bancshares found 35% at fault on the third-party petition.
Which court heard Grace P. Irwin v. Commerce Bancshares v. Central Bank of ...?
This case was heard in 16th Circuit Court, Jackson County, Missouri, MO. The presiding judge was John R. O'Malley.
Who were the attorneys in Grace P. Irwin v. Commerce Bancshares v. Central Bank of ...?
Plaintiff's attorney: Matthew S. Jensen, Kansas City, Missouri. Defendant's attorney: James R. Borthwick, Kansas City, Missouri and William F. Logan, Topeka, Kansas for Central Bank of Kansas City, Missouri.
When was Grace P. Irwin v. Commerce Bancshares v. Central Bank of ... decided?
This case was decided on November 13, 2000.