Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
D. Joseph Kurtz, et al. v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Date: 07-03-2025
Case Number: 14-CV-01142
Judge: Pamela K. Chen
Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Kings County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: Anna St. John for Objector
Samuel Rudman, Vincent Serra for Plaintiffs
Defendant's Attorney: Theodore Boutrous, Jr., Patrick Reischl, Tim Loose, Dan Adler, Pat Fuster, Kara McCall, Eamon Joyce for Defendant.
Plaintiffs Gladys Honigman and D. Joseph Kurtz brought two separate class action lawsuits against Defendant Kimberly-Clark Corporation, each alleging that Defendant had falsely advertised their moist bathroom wipes as "flushable.†According to Plaintiffs, this led purchasers to pay an unjustified price premium for the product and to flush the wipes, causing plumbing damage. After years of litigation, Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and all class members, entered into a shared Settlement Agreement ("Agreementâ€) with Defendant in 2022.
About This Case
What was the outcome of D. Joseph Kurtz, et al. v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation?
The outcome was: Reversed and remanded.
Which court heard D. Joseph Kurtz, et al. v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Kings County), ny. The presiding judge was Pamela K. Chen.
Who were the attorneys in D. Joseph Kurtz, et al. v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation?
Plaintiff's attorney: Anna St. John for Objector Samuel Rudman, Vincent Serra for Plaintiffs. Defendant's attorney: Theodore Boutrous, Jr., Patrick Reischl, Tim Loose, Dan Adler, Pat Fuster, Kara McCall, Eamon Joyce for Defendant..
When was D. Joseph Kurtz, et al. v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation decided?
This case was decided on July 3, 2025.