Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Muhammad Asif Hafeez

Date: 06-20-2025

Case Number: 14-CR-716

Judge: Victor Marrero

Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (New York County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney's Office

Defendant's Attorney: Anthony Cecutti and Steve Zissou, and Kestine Thiele

Description:

New York City, New York criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant charged with attempt/conspiracy to distribute controlled substance.

Outcome:

Imprisonment for a total term of 192 months imprisonment on count I and count II, to run concurrently. The Court notes that the defendant has been in continuous custody since his arrest on August 25, 2017, such that defendant's term of imprisonment began on August 25, 2017. Supervised release for a term of Five Years on Count 1 and 2, to run concurrently.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Muhammad Asif Hafeez?

The outcome was: Imprisonment for a total term of 192 months imprisonment on count I and count II, to run concurrently. The Court notes that the defendant has been in continuous custody since his arrest on August 25, 2017, such that defendant's term of imprisonment began on August 25, 2017. Supervised release for a term of Five Years on Count 1 and 2, to run concurrently.

Which court heard United States of America v. Muhammad Asif Hafeez?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (New York County), NY. The presiding judge was Victor Marrero.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Muhammad Asif Hafeez?

Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney's Office. Defendant's attorney: Anthony Cecutti and Steve Zissou, and Kestine Thiele.

When was United States of America v. Muhammad Asif Hafeez decided?

This case was decided on June 20, 2025.