Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

State of Kansas v. Jordan Kristopher Yardley

Date: 03-08-2025

Case Number: 126,594

Judge: Tyler Roush

Court: District Court, Sedgwick County, Kansas

Plaintiff's Attorney: Sedgwick County, Kansas District Attorney's Office

Defendant's Attorney:





Click Here For The Best Wichita Personal Injury Lawyer Directory





Description:
Wichita, Kansas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with child abuse.

After the district court revoked Jordan Kristopher Yardley's probation, he moved to withdraw his plea. Yardley alleged his mental health impaired his ability to enter his plea; he lacked sufficient time to review the plea agreement; plea counsel had failed to introduce exonerating evidence and had failed to communicate the consequences of his charges or the plea agreement details; and plea counsel and his law partner h ad coerced him into accepting the plea. The district court denied Yardley's motion to withdraw his plea. Yardley appeals, yet having reviewed the record we find no reason to reverse.



CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. PLEA WITHDRAWAL. The case discusses the trial court's denial of a motion to withdraw a no contest plea, wherein the appellant alleged impaired mental health, inadequate counsel communication, lack of voluntary consent due to coercion, and a strong defense theory. The court evaluated whether the plea was understood and voluntarily made, and if counsel's performance adhered to an objective standard of reasonableness, ultimately affirming the denial based on substantial competent evidence.



CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL. The case explores the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, assessing whether the counsel's performance fell below reasonable standards and whether the errors made led to material prejudice affecting the plea outcome. The court upheld that the counsel's actions were within professional boundaries and did not constitute grounds for manifest injustice.



CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. MENTAL HEALTH AND DECISION-MAKING. The judgment evaluates the impact of the appellant's mental health on their decision-making capability when entering a plea, examining whether mental conditions might have undermined the voluntariness of the plea. The court concluded that there was no substantial evidence of impaired decision-making at the time of the plea.



Key Phrases Probation revocation. Aggravated endangering a child. Plea agreement. Ineffective assistance of counsel. Mental health impact.





MoreLaw

was created to help people find the right lawyers to represent them based on the performance history of trial lawyers in every county of the United States. Click the link above to see a list of the lawyers that MoreLaw has identified who practice law where this case was litigated.

Kent Morlan, Esq.



Outcome:
Affiormed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of State of Kansas v. Jordan Kristopher Yardley?

The outcome was: Affiormed

Which court heard State of Kansas v. Jordan Kristopher Yardley?

This case was heard in District Court, Sedgwick County, Kansas, KS. The presiding judge was Tyler Roush.

Who were the attorneys in State of Kansas v. Jordan Kristopher Yardley?

Plaintiff's attorney: Sedgwick County, Kansas District Attorney's Office. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Wichita Personal Injury Lawyer Directory.

When was State of Kansas v. Jordan Kristopher Yardley decided?

This case was decided on March 8, 2025.