Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of America v. Ty Mauldin
Date: 07-17-2026
Case Number: 1:25-cr-00147
Judge: Jennifer L. Hall
Court: United States District Court for the District of Delaware (New Castle County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: M. David Tambussi, Jr.
Defendant's Attorney: John Malik
Reported by Kent Morlan
Ty Mauldin, 35, used his access as a medical biller and credentialer—which allowed him to obtain medical professionals’ licensure information—to order himself thousands of opioid pills through wholesale pharmaceutical suppliers, all unbeknownst to the medical professionals who were the victims of his scheme.
Mauldin also exploited this access to electronic medical records by falsifying his own health information so that he could pose as a cancer patient and thereby obtain pain management services, including the installation of an intrathecal pain pump and the prescription of opioids, all of which were paid for by his private health insurer.
Additionally, Mauldin represented himself as a certified health professional to his colleagues and patients, including holding himself out as a licensed nurse. Based on these false representations, Mauldin convinced a Nurse Practitioner to allow him to perform Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation therapy on patients and then submitted false claims to Medicaid for reimbursement for performing said therapy.
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States of America v. Ty Mauldin?
The outcome was: Mauldin pleaded guilty to Aggravated Identify Theft and Obtaining Drugs (Oxycodone, a Schedule II controlled substance) by Fraud. He faces a mandatory minimum of 2 years in prison on the Aggravated Identity Theft charge, which would run consecutively to any term of imprisonment imposed on the Obtaining Drugs by Fraud charge.The maximum penalty for the Obtaining Drugs by Fraud Charge is 4 years of imprisonment. Actual sentences for federal crimes are typically less than the maximum penalties. A federal district court judge will determine the sentence after taking into account the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.
Which court heard United States of America v. Ty Mauldin?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Delaware (New Castle County), DE. The presiding judge was Jennifer L. Hall.
Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Ty Mauldin?
Plaintiff's attorney: M. David Tambussi, Jr.. Defendant's attorney: John Malik.
When was United States of America v. Ty Mauldin decided?
This case was decided on July 17, 2026.