Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Clinton Rathan

Date: 04-20-2026

Case Number: 1:25-cr-00055

Judge: Paul J. Barbadoro

Court: United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire (Merrimack County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Concord

Defendant's Attorney:


Click Here For The Best Concord Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory

Description:
Concord, New Hampshire, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with wire fraud.

Clinton Rathan, 33, was charged with four counts of Wire Fraud. He was arrested in Brookyln, New York, on April 16, 2026, and released on $15,000 bond. He is scheduled to appear in federal court in Concord, New Hampshire, on April 30, 2026.

Rathan placed over 500 pick-up orders for groceries through the Hannaford app across a seven-month period in 2022. Rathan used false or fraudulently-obtained identities and debit or credit cards to place the orders across New England and New York. After Rathan picked up the grocery orders, Hannaford tried to process the debit or credit card information, but the cards were all declined.

The charging statute provides a sentence of up to 20 years in prison, up to 3 years of supervised release, and a fine of up to $250,000 or twice the gross gain or loss, whichever is greater. Sentences are imposed by a federal district court judge based upon the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and statutes which govern the determination of a sentence in a criminal case.

Homeland Security Investigations led the investigation. Assistant U.S. Attorney Alexander S. Chen is prosecuting the case.

The details contained in the charging documents are allegations. The defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
Outcome:
A criminal charge is not proof of guilt.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Clinton Rathan?

The outcome was: A criminal charge is not proof of guilt.

Which court heard United States of America v. Clinton Rathan?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire (Merrimack County), NH. The presiding judge was Paul J. Barbadoro.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Clinton Rathan?

Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Concord. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Concord Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.

When was United States of America v. Clinton Rathan decided?

This case was decided on April 20, 2026.