Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Jose Escobedo v. La Haciendita Mexican Restaurant Incorporated, et al.
Date: 10-02-2024
Case Number: 1:24-cv-00839
Judge: Jennifer L. Thruston
Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of California (Fresno County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Fresno Civil Rights Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney: Michael Charles Titus
Fresno, California civil rights Americans With Disabilities Act lawyer represented the Plaintiff.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a civil rights law that protects people with disabilities from discrimination in many areas of public life. The ADA's purpose is to ensure that people with disabilities have the same opportunities as everyone else.
The ADA covers a wide range of topics, including:
Employment
The ADA prohibits employers from requiring medical examinations before offering a job, or from rejecting a candidate based on disability-related information from a medical exam.
Transportation
The ADA covers public transportation offered by state or local governments, as well as privately funded transportation.
Public accommodations
The ADA applies to public and private places that are open to the general public.
Service animals
The ADA generally requires that businesses, nonprofit organizations, and state and local governments allow service animals in areas where the public is allowed to go.
The ADA also applies to the United States Congress.
The ADA defines a person with a disability as someone who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities.
10/01/2024 9 MINUTE ORDER (TEXT Only): On October 1, 2024, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of this action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. Doc. No. 8 . In light of the notice, this action is terminated by operation of law without further order from the Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The Court VACATES all pending dates and matters and directs the Clerk of the Court to CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 10/1/2024. (Apodaca, P) (Entered: 10/01/2024)
About This Case
What was the outcome of Jose Escobedo v. La Haciendita Mexican Restaurant Incorpo...?
The outcome was: 10/01/2024 8 NOTICE of VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL by Jose Escobedo. (Moore, Tanya) (Entered: 10/01/2024) 10/01/2024 9 MINUTE ORDER (TEXT Only): On October 1, 2024, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of this action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. Doc. No. 8 . In light of the notice, this action is terminated by operation of law without further order from the Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The Court VACATES all pending dates and matters and directs the Clerk of the Court to CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 10/1/2024. (Apodaca, P) (Entered: 10/01/2024)
Which court heard Jose Escobedo v. La Haciendita Mexican Restaurant Incorpo...?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of California (Fresno County), CA. The presiding judge was Jennifer L. Thruston.
Who were the attorneys in Jose Escobedo v. La Haciendita Mexican Restaurant Incorpo...?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Fresno Civil Rights Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Michael Charles Titus.
When was Jose Escobedo v. La Haciendita Mexican Restaurant Incorpo... decided?
This case was decided on October 2, 2024.