Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Ruth Ann Cigax v. Kroger Limited Partnership

Date: 07-29-2024

Case Number: 1:23-CV-01801

Judge: James R. Sweeney, II

Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana (Marion County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:





Click Here For The Best Indianapolis Personal Injury Lawyer Directory







Defendant's Attorney: Jeffrey S. Zipes

Description:



Indianapolis, Indiana personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.





This case was filed in the Hamilton Superior Court #3, 29D03-2309-CT-008585, and was removed to federal court by Kroger.



Premises Owners owe customers the duty to exercise reasonable care to protect the customer from foreseeable dangers on the premises; however, there is no duty to insure a customer's safety while on the premises.
Outcome:
Amended Final Judgment - This action is dismissed with prejudice. This is a final judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 7/29/2024.(KAA) (Entered: 07/29/2024)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Ruth Ann Cigax v. Kroger Limited Partnership?

The outcome was: Amended Final Judgment - This action is dismissed with prejudice. This is a final judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 7/29/2024.(KAA) (Entered: 07/29/2024)

Which court heard Ruth Ann Cigax v. Kroger Limited Partnership?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana (Marion County), IN. The presiding judge was James R. Sweeney, II.

Who were the attorneys in Ruth Ann Cigax v. Kroger Limited Partnership?

Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Indianapolis Personal Injury Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Jeffrey S. Zipes.

When was Ruth Ann Cigax v. Kroger Limited Partnership decided?

This case was decided on July 29, 2024.