Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Surendrakumar Bardoliwala v. Mike Hankey, et al.
Date: 01-25-2024
Case Number: 1:23-cv-00625
Judge: Kirtan Khalsa
Court: United States District Court for the District of New Mexico
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Albuquerque Immigration Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney: Benjamin Garrett Minegar
A mandamus action may be filed in court to compel USCIS, or any administrative agency, to act where there has been an unreasonable delay that causes harm to the applicant. A mandamus essentially forces the administrative government agency to act.
About This Case
What was the outcome of Surendrakumar Bardoliwala v. Mike Hankey, et al.?
The outcome was: NOTICE OF CONSENT SUBMISSION DEADLINE: In light of the pending dispositive motion, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), the parties are reminded that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that this matter will be reassigned to a district judge as presiding judge if written consents from all parties have not been filed by February 12, 2024.
Which court heard Surendrakumar Bardoliwala v. Mike Hankey, et al.?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of New Mexico, NM. The presiding judge was Kirtan Khalsa.
Who were the attorneys in Surendrakumar Bardoliwala v. Mike Hankey, et al.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Albuquerque Immigration Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Benjamin Garrett Minegar.
When was Surendrakumar Bardoliwala v. Mike Hankey, et al. decided?
This case was decided on January 25, 2024.