Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Leighann Marquez v. Robert Baca, et al.

Date: 01-12-2024

Case Number: 1:23-cv-00311

Judge: Martha Vazquez

Court: United States District Court for the District of New Mexico

Plaintiff's Attorney:





Click Here For The Best Albuquerque Insurance Lawyer Directory







Defendant's Attorney: Albuquerque, New Mexico, insurance defense lawyer represented the Defendant.

Description:
Albuquerque, New Mexico, insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a bad faith breach of contract theory.



This case was filed in the Fourth Judicial District Court and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.



Plaintiff challenged removal and sought remand.



New Mexico recognizes the tort of bad faith delay or refusal to pay a valid claim by an insured. Under New Mexico law, there is an implied covenant of fair dealing which creates an obligation between the parties to an insurance contract to act in good faith.
Outcome:
Notice-Letter from Fourth Judicial District Court acknowledging receipt of records re 20 Order on Motion to Remand to State Court. (cmm) (Entered: 01/23/2024)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Leighann Marquez v. Robert Baca, et al.?

The outcome was: Notice-Letter from Fourth Judicial District Court acknowledging receipt of records re 20 Order on Motion to Remand to State Court. (cmm) (Entered: 01/23/2024)

Which court heard Leighann Marquez v. Robert Baca, et al.?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of New Mexico, NM. The presiding judge was Martha Vazquez.

Who were the attorneys in Leighann Marquez v. Robert Baca, et al.?

Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Albuquerque Insurance Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Albuquerque, New Mexico, insurance defense lawyer represented the Defendant..

When was Leighann Marquez v. Robert Baca, et al. decided?

This case was decided on January 12, 2024.