Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Gail H. Clayton and thomas A. Clayton v. Alexander Wells and Allyson P. Wells
Date: 12-06-2024
Case Number: 1:22-CV-908
Judge: Loretta C. Biggs
Court: United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina (Guilford County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Greensboro Real Property Law Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney: Daniel F. E. Smith
Description:
Greensboro, North Carolina pro se Plaintiff sued seeking relief from a state court foreclosure judgment.
Motion for dismiss based on Rooker-Feldman doctrine.
Motion for dismiss based on Rooker-Feldman doctrine.
Outcome:
Motion to dismiss granted.
Affirmed
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Gail H. Clayton and thomas A. Clayton v. Alexander Wells ...?
The outcome was: Motion to dismiss granted. Affirmed
Which court heard Gail H. Clayton and thomas A. Clayton v. Alexander Wells ...?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina (Guilford County), NC. The presiding judge was Loretta C. Biggs.
Who were the attorneys in Gail H. Clayton and thomas A. Clayton v. Alexander Wells ...?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Greensboro Real Property Law Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Daniel F. E. Smith.
When was Gail H. Clayton and thomas A. Clayton v. Alexander Wells ... decided?
This case was decided on December 6, 2024.