Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Dale LaCompte v. Chicago Capital Holdings, Inc., et al.
Date: 01-24-2023
Case Number: 1:21-cv-01011
Judge: Charles B. Kormann
Court: United States District Court for the District of South Dakota (Brown County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: Chet Groseclose; Matthew A. Tysdal, Pete Heidepriem, Scott N. Heidepriem
Defendant's Attorney: Ellen P. Prochaska, Kristopher J. Covi, Lindsey Riter-Rapp, A. Jason Rumpca, Gretche L. McGill, Tiffay S. Boutcher
On March 31, 2021, plaintiff Dale LaCompte filed suit against Chicago Capital Holdings, Inc., Mr. David D. Onion, and AG Financial Partners LLC, alleging violations of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1691, et seq., and the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, et seq. Doc 1. Plaintiff is a resident of Timber Lake, South Dakota, located in the Central Division of the District of South Dakota. Plaintiffs farm, which he holds in fee simple, is located on the Standing Rock Indian Reservation and within Corson County, located in the Northern Division of the District of South Dakota. None of the defendants reside in South Dakota.
About This Case
What was the outcome of Dale LaCompte v. Chicago Capital Holdings, Inc., et al.?
The outcome was: 01/24/2023 82Â JUDGMENT of Dismissal. (SKK) (Main Document 82 replaced on 1/25/2023) (SKK). (Entered: 01/24/2023)
Which court heard Dale LaCompte v. Chicago Capital Holdings, Inc., et al.?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of South Dakota (Brown County), SD. The presiding judge was Charles B. Kormann.
Who were the attorneys in Dale LaCompte v. Chicago Capital Holdings, Inc., et al.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Chet Groseclose; Matthew A. Tysdal, Pete Heidepriem, Scott N. Heidepriem. Defendant's attorney: Ellen P. Prochaska, Kristopher J. Covi, Lindsey Riter-Rapp, A. Jason Rumpca, Gretche L. McGill, Tiffay S. Boutcher.
When was Dale LaCompte v. Chicago Capital Holdings, Inc., et al. decided?
This case was decided on January 24, 2023.