Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Corinne Feliciano v. United States of America

Date: 07-11-2023

Case Number: 1:21-cv-00417

Judge: Jill A. Otake

Court: United States District Court for the District Hawaii (Honolulu County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: <center><br> <h2><br> <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/hawaii/lawyers/honolulu/personal_injury.asp" target="_new"><h2>Click Here For The Best Honolulu Personal Injury Lawyer Directory</h2></a></font><br> </h2><br> </center><br>

Defendant's Attorney: Dana A. Barbata

Description:
Honolulu, Hawaii personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Clims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care by a federal government employee.



Hawaii Auto Negligence Law:



"Duty of Care: All drivers in Hawaii have a duty to operate their vehicles safely and follow traffic laws to avoid harming others. This includes avoiding behaviors like:



Speeding

Distracted driving

Driving under the influence (DUI)

Reckless driving

Failing to yield right of way

Ignoring traffic signals



Breach of Duty: The injured party must prove that the other driver breached their duty of care, causing the accident and resulting injuries. Evidence like:



Police reports

Witness statements

Accident scene photos

Vehicle damage photos

Medical records



Proximate Cause: The breach of duty must be the direct cause of the accident and injuries. Simply showing the driver was negligent isn't enough; you must prove their negligence directly caused the harm.



Modified Comparative Negligence: Hawaii follows a modified comparative negligence rule. This means that even if the injured party is partially at fault, they can still recover damages, with their compensation proportionally reduced based on their percentage of fault. However, if the injured party's negligence is greater than 50%, they cannot recover any damages.



Statute of Limitations: Claims in Hawaii have a two-year statute of limitations, starting from the date of the accident.



Additional Points:



No-fault system: Hawaii is a no-fault state, meaning your own personal injury protection (PIP) coverage covers your medical expenses and lost wages up to certain limits, regardless of who caused the accident. You can only sue the at-fault driver if you meet specific injury thresholds.

Legal resources: Consult the Hawaii State Bar Association or Hawaii Department of Transportation for guidance and resources.

Insurance: Hawaii requires drivers to carry minimum amounts of PIP and liability coverage. This can play a significant role in covering damages and navigating negligence claims.



Specific Scenarios:



Here are some situations where Hawaii auto negligence law might apply:



Car accidents: A driver violating traffic laws and causing a collision could be liable for resulting injuries, exceeding PIP coverage thresholds.

Hit-and-run accidents: The injured party can still pursue compensation through their PIP coverage or uninsured/underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage if the at-fault driver is unknown or uninsured.

Pedestrian accidents: Drivers have a duty to exercise due care towards pedestrians and are liable for causing injuries due to negligence.



Seeking Legal Help:



If you believe you've been harmed due to someone else's negligence in a Hawaii auto accident, it's crucial to consult with an experienced personal injury attorney specializing in Hawaii auto negligence. They can:



Assess your case and identify potential legal options.

Gather evidence and build your case.

Navigate the no-fault system and liability claims.

Negotiate with insurance companies or represent you in court."



Google Bard







Outcome:
Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Corinne Feliciano v. United States of America?

The outcome was: Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.

Which court heard Corinne Feliciano v. United States of America?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the District Hawaii (Honolulu County), HI. The presiding judge was Jill A. Otake.

Who were the attorneys in Corinne Feliciano v. United States of America?

Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Honolulu Personal Injury Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Dana A. Barbata.

When was Corinne Feliciano v. United States of America decided?

This case was decided on July 11, 2023.