Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Mamdou Bah, et al. v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Boston, LLC, et al.

Date: 06-20-2025

Case Number: 1:17-cv-12542

Judge: Mark L. Wofe

Court: United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (Suffolk County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Thomas Fowler, Shannon Liss-Riordan, Sam Davis

Defendant's Attorney: Barry Miller, Jason Schwartz, Jacob Spencer, Ryan Stewart, Amalia Reiss, Kelly Skowera

Description:
Boston, Massachusetts labor law lawyers represented a class of plaintiff suing on a Fair Labor Standards Act violation theory.



Mamadou Bah's complaint alleged that, in violation of the FLSA, Enterprise Boston and EHI failed to pay overtime wages prior to November 27, 2016, to assistant branch managers whom, like himself, the two companies jointly employed. As support for the FLSA claims, the complaint alleged as follows.



* * *



The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) is a US federal law designed to promote the accuracy, fairness, and privacy of information in the files of consumer reporting agencies. It regulates how consumer reporting agencies (CRAs) collect, use, and share consumer information, particularly credit information. Key aspects include ensuring the accuracy of credit reports, limiting who can access them, and providing consumers with rights to access and dispute information in their reports.



Key Provisions of the FCRA:



Regulation of Consumer Reporting Agencies (CRAs):



The FCRA defines and regulates CRAs, which are entities that collect and report information about consumers' creditworthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, character, general reputation, personal characteristics, or mode of living.



Permissible Purposes for Accessing Credit Reports:



The FCRA specifies the circumstances under which CRAs can provide consumer reports to third parties. Generally, access is limited to entities with a "permissible purpose," such as lenders, insurers, employers, and certain government agencies.



Consumer Rights:



The FCRA grants consumers several important rights, including:



Access to their credit reports: Consumers can request and obtain their credit reports from CRAs.



Dispute inaccurate information: Consumers can dispute information they believe is inaccurate, incomplete, or unverifiable, and CRAs must investigate and correct or delete inaccurate information.

Notification of adverse actions: If a consumer is denied credit, insurance, or employment based on information in their credit report, the user of the report must notify the consumer and provide the name and contact information of the CRA.

Fraud alerts: Consumers can place fraud alerts on their credit files to help prevent identity theft.



Accuracy and Fairness:



The FCRA mandates that CRAs follow reasonable procedures to ensure the accuracy, fairness, and privacy of consumer information.



Time Limits on Negative Information:



The FCRA sets time limits on how long certain negative information, such as late payments and bankruptcies, can remain on a consumer's credit report.



Disclosures:



The FCRA requires CRAs to disclose certain information to consumers, such as the nature and substance of all information in their credit file.



Disputes and Investigations:



When a consumer disputes information in their credit report, the CRA must conduct a reasonable investigation and notify the consumer of the results.



Penalties for Violations:



The FCRA includes provisions for penalties for violations, which can include civil lawsuits and fines.



In essence, the FCRA aims to balance the needs of businesses that use credit information with the rights of consumers to privacy, accuracy, and fairness in the handling of their credit information.









Outcome:
Tolling the statute of limitations in such cases is necessary.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Mamdou Bah, et al. v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Bo...?

The outcome was: Tolling the statute of limitations in such cases is necessary.

Which court heard Mamdou Bah, et al. v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Bo...?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (Suffolk County), MA. The presiding judge was Mark L. Wofe.

Who were the attorneys in Mamdou Bah, et al. v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Bo...?

Plaintiff's attorney: Thomas Fowler, Shannon Liss-Riordan, Sam Davis. Defendant's attorney: Barry Miller, Jason Schwartz, Jacob Spencer, Ryan Stewart, Amalia Reiss, Kelly Skowera.

When was Mamdou Bah, et al. v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Bo... decided?

This case was decided on June 20, 2025.