Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Charles M. Butler, III, et al. v. Unified Life Insurance Company, et al.

Date: 01-14-2022

Case Number: 1:17-cv-00050

Judge: Susan P. Watters

Court: United States District Court for the District of Montana (Yellowstone County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:





Click Here For The Best Billings Insurance Law Lawyer Directory







Defendant's Attorney: Billings, Montana insurance law lawyers represented the Defendants.

Description:
Billings, Montana insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on bad faith breach of contract theories.



In order to establish a breach of contract claim against an insurance company, the Plaintiff must prove the following three elements: The existence of a contract, A breach of 1 or more of the contract's terms by the insurer, and. Damages suffered as a result of the breach.
Outcome:
Settled on unknown terms.



STATUS REPORT Concerning Final Distribution of Cy Pres Funds by Charles M. Butler, III. (Morrison, John) (Entered: 03/30/2023)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Charles M. Butler, III, et al. v. Unified Life Insurance ...?

The outcome was: Settled on unknown terms. STATUS REPORT Concerning Final Distribution of Cy Pres Funds by Charles M. Butler, III. (Morrison, John) (Entered: 03/30/2023)

Which court heard Charles M. Butler, III, et al. v. Unified Life Insurance ...?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Montana (Yellowstone County), MT. The presiding judge was Susan P. Watters.

Who were the attorneys in Charles M. Butler, III, et al. v. Unified Life Insurance ...?

Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Billings Insurance Law Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Billings, Montana insurance law lawyers represented the Defendants..

When was Charles M. Butler, III, et al. v. Unified Life Insurance ... decided?

This case was decided on January 14, 2022.