Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

In re The State of Texas

Date: 02-24-2020

Case Number: 04-19-00847-CR

Judge: PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice

Court: Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Plaintiff's Attorney: Samuel C. Adams

Defendant's Attorney:



Need help finding a lawyer for representation for filing a petition for writ of mandamus in Texas?



Call 918-582-6422. It's Free.







Description:






MoreLaw Suites









Virtual Offices of Solo Practice Lawyer Starting at $200 a Month

Office With MoreLaw Suites and Reduce Your Overhead





918-582-3993 - Info@MoreLaw.com







Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus asking this court to compel the presiding

judge of the San Antonio Municipal Court to (1) vacate his December 4, 2019 instruction to the

venire panel, and (2) vacate his December 4, 2019 instruction of the law in the jury charge.

This court’s mandamus jurisdiction is limited to writs against a district court judge or

county court judge in our district and all writs necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. TEX. GOV’T

CODE § 22.221(a), (b). We do not have authority to issue writs of mandamus against a municipal

court judge unless it is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. In re Chang, 176 S.W.3d 451, 452

(Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, orig. proceeding) (per curiam); see also In re Gomez, 04

19-00019-CR, 2019 WL 286085, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Jan. 23, 2019, orig. proceeding)

(per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (holding same).
Outcome:
Relator does not contend that issuance of the writ is necessary to enforce this court’s jurisdiction; therefore, we dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of In re The State of Texas?

The outcome was: Relator does not contend that issuance of the writ is necessary to enforce this court’s jurisdiction; therefore, we dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.

Which court heard In re The State of Texas?

This case was heard in Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas, TX. The presiding judge was PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice.

Who were the attorneys in In re The State of Texas?

Plaintiff's attorney: Samuel C. Adams. Defendant's attorney: Need help finding a lawyer for representation for filing a petition for writ of mandamus in Texas? Call 918-582-6422. It's Free..

When was In re The State of Texas decided?

This case was decided on February 24, 2020.