Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Jeremiah W. Holder v. Carla R. Holder
Date: 09-06-2002
Case Number: 01-35467
Judge: Richard A. Paez
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Plaintiff's Attorney: Rhea J. Rolfe, Edmonds, Washington, for the petitioner-apellant-
cross-appellee.
Defendant's Attorney: A. Chad Allred, Seattle, Washington, for the respondent-appellee-
cross-appellant.
States Air Force stationed in Germany, appeals the order of
the district court staying his petition for return of his children
from Washington State to Germany under the Hague Conven-tion
on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction
("the Hague Convention"), Oct. 25, 1980, 19 I.L.M. 1501, as
implemented by the International Child Abduction Remedies
Act ("ICARA"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 11601-11610. Jeremiah had
previously commenced divorce and custody proceedings
against Carla R. Holder ("Carla"), the children's mother, in
California state court. As a result of those pending state court
proceedings, the district court stayed the action pending reso-lution
of Jeremiah's state court appeal, invoking Colorado
River Water Conservation District v. United States, 424 U.S.
800 (1976). Carla cross-appeals the district court's denial of
her request for attorney's fees and costs.
* * *
Click the case caption above for the full
text of the Court's opinion.
adjudicated Jeremiah’s Hague Convention petition in accordance with the purposes of the treaty and its implementing
legislation. The Hague Convention seeks to prevent an
abducting parent from gaining any advantage in litigation by
providing the left-behind parent with an expeditious avenue
for seeking return of the abducted child in addition to those
remedies available under the local laws of the country to
which the child has been taken. With those purposes in mind,
we conclude that Jeremiah’s decision to file for custody in
state court in California, but bring his Hague Convention petition
in federal court in Washington, does not now mean that
he is barred from raising them in federal court by the preclusive
effect of the state court judgment or that he has waived
his rights under the Hague Convention.
About This Case
What was the outcome of Jeremiah W. Holder v. Carla R. Holder?
The outcome was: We conclude that the district court should have promptly adjudicated Jeremiah’s Hague Convention petition in accordance with the purposes of the treaty and its implementing legislation. The Hague Convention seeks to prevent an abducting parent from gaining any advantage in litigation by providing the left-behind parent with an expeditious avenue for seeking return of the abducted child in addition to those remedies available under the local laws of the country to which the child has been taken. With those purposes in mind, we conclude that Jeremiah’s decision to file for custody in state court in California, but bring his Hague Convention petition in federal court in Washington, does not now mean that he is barred from raising them in federal court by the preclusive effect of the state court judgment or that he has waived his rights under the Hague Convention.
Which court heard Jeremiah W. Holder v. Carla R. Holder?
This case was heard in United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, WA. The presiding judge was Richard A. Paez.
Who were the attorneys in Jeremiah W. Holder v. Carla R. Holder?
Plaintiff's attorney: Rhea J. Rolfe, Edmonds, Washington, for the petitioner-apellant- cross-appellee.. Defendant's attorney: A. Chad Allred, Seattle, Washington, for the respondent-appellee- cross-appellant..
When was Jeremiah W. Holder v. Carla R. Holder decided?
This case was decided on September 6, 2002.