Defendant's Attorney: Ana H. Voss, Angela Thurton Millard, James D. Sides
Description:
Minneapolis, Minnesota social security disability lawyer represented Plaintiff seeking review of the denial of his application for Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI benefits by HHS.
Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) eligibility is based on your work history. "There's no flat amount you receive,†says Francine, "because everyone's earnings are different. The majority of people with intellectual/developmental disabilities (I/DD) haven't worked enough to qualify for SSDI, but they may be able to receive SSI."
Outcome:
ORDER denying 13 Plaintiff's motion for judgment; granting 15 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Written Opinion.) Signed by Judge Paul A. Magnuson on 8/7/2023. (ALT) (Entered: 08/07/2023)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
Related Cases from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota (Hennepin County)
What was the outcome of P.H. v. Social Security Administration?
The outcome was: ORDER denying 13 Plaintiff's motion for judgment; granting 15 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Written Opinion.) Signed by Judge Paul A. Magnuson on 8/7/2023. (ALT) (Entered: 08/07/2023)
Which court heard P.H. v. Social Security Administration?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Minnesota (Hennepin County), MN. The presiding judge was Paul A. Magnuson.
Who were the attorneys in P.H. v. Social Security Administration?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Social Security Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Ana H. Voss, Angela Thurton Millard, James D. Sides.
When was P.H. v. Social Security Administration decided?