Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Kathleen Pomales and Michael Pomales v. United States of America

Date: 03-11-2022

Case Number: 0:20-cv-62596-BB

Judge: Beth Bloom

Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Duval County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Mark Hanson

Defendant's Attorney: Felipe Plechac-Diaz

Description:

Fort Lauderdale, Florida personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued the United States of America on Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence wrongful death theories claiming to have been injured and/or damaged in a motor vehicle accident caused by a federal government employee.

Outcome:

03/11/2022 35 FINAL MEDIATION REPORT by John B. Marion, IV. Disposition: Settled in full.(Marion, John) (Entered: 03/11/2022)

03/11/2022 36 ORDER Administratively Closing Case upon 35 Mediation Report. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 3/11/2022. See attached document for full details. (ls) (Entered: 03/11/2022)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Kathleen Pomales and Michael Pomales v. United States of ...?

The outcome was: 03/11/2022 35 FINAL MEDIATION REPORT by John B. Marion, IV. Disposition: Settled in full.(Marion, John) (Entered: 03/11/2022) 03/11/2022 36 ORDER Administratively Closing Case upon 35 Mediation Report. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 3/11/2022. See attached document for full details. (ls) (Entered: 03/11/2022)

Which court heard Kathleen Pomales and Michael Pomales v. United States of ...?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Duval County), FL. The presiding judge was Beth Bloom.

Who were the attorneys in Kathleen Pomales and Michael Pomales v. United States of ...?

Plaintiff's attorney: Mark Hanson. Defendant's attorney: Felipe Plechac-Diaz.

When was Kathleen Pomales and Michael Pomales v. United States of ... decided?

This case was decided on March 11, 2022.