Andrew Arashiba v. City of Minneapolis

Minneapolis, Minnesota plaintiff civil rights violation lawyer sued Defendant on a job discrimination theory under 29 U.S.C. 621, "(a) The Congress hereby finds and declares that—



(1) in the face of rising productivity and affluence, older workers find themselves disadvantaged in their efforts to retain employment, and especially to regain employment when displaced from jobs;



(2) the setting of arbitrary age limits regardless of potential for job performance has become a common practice, and certain otherwise desirable practices may work to the disadvantage of older persons;



(3) the incidence of unemployment, especially long-term unemployment with resultant deterioration of skill, morale, and employer acceptability is, relative to the younger ages, high among older workers; their numbers are great and growing; and their employment problems grave;



(4) the existence in industries affecting commerce, of arbitrary discrimination in employment because of age, burdens commerce and the free flow of goods in commerce.



(b) It is therefore the purpose of this chapter to promote employment of older persons based on their ability rather than age; to prohibit arbitrary age discrimination in employment; to help employers and workers find ways of meeting problems arising from the impact of age on employment."

12/22/2021 58 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant City of Minneapolis's Motion for Summary Judgment 39 is GRANTED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Signed by The Hon. Paul A. Magnuson on 12/22/2021. (LLM) (Entered: 12/22/2021)

12/27/2021 59 JUDGMENT (Attachments: # 1 Civil Notice - appeal)(MMP) (Entered: 12/27/2021)