Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
James Paul Aery v. Ernie Beitel; Calandra Allen; Summit Food Service, LLC
Date: 05-18-2025
Case Number: 0:20-cv-00055
Judge: John R. Tunheim
Court: United States District Court for the District of Minnesota (Hennepin County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Minneapolis Employment Law Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Minneapolis Civil Litigation Directory
Description:
Minneapolis, Minnesota pro se plaintiff sued on a civil rights violation theory.
MoreLaw was created to help people find experienced lawyers to represent them in the more than 3,144 counties across the United States. Click the link above to see a list of lawyers ready and willing to represent you if you have a legal problem and need help. Call: 918-582-6422 for help.
MoreLaw was created to help people find experienced lawyers to represent them in the more than 3,144 counties across the United States. Click the link above to see a list of lawyers ready and willing to represent you if you have a legal problem and need help. Call: 918-582-6422 for help.
Outcome:
Motion to dismiss granted.
Affirmed.
Affirmed.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of James Paul Aery v. Ernie Beitel; Calandra Allen; Summit F...?
The outcome was: Motion to dismiss granted. Affirmed.
Which court heard James Paul Aery v. Ernie Beitel; Calandra Allen; Summit F...?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Minnesota (Hennepin County), MN. The presiding judge was John R. Tunheim.
Who were the attorneys in James Paul Aery v. Ernie Beitel; Calandra Allen; Summit F...?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Minneapolis Employment Law Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Minneapolis Civil Litigation Directory.
When was James Paul Aery v. Ernie Beitel; Calandra Allen; Summit F... decided?
This case was decided on May 18, 2025.