Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Capital Records, Inc. v. Jammie Thomas-Rasset

Date: 11-04-2010

Case Number: 0:06-cv-01497-MJD -LIB

Judge: Michael J. Davis

Court: United States District Court for the District of Minnesota (Hennepin County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Kara Barrow, Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., Minneapolis, Minnesota for Arista Records LLC, et al.

Felicia Boyd, Barnes & Thornburg, L.L.P., Minneapolis, Minnesota

Defendant's Attorney: Garrett D Blanchfield, Reinhardt Wendorf & Blanchfield, St. Paul, Minnesota

Bryan Bleichner, Chestnut Cambronne, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota

K.A.D. Camara, Camara & Sibley, Houston, Texas

Carl Christensen, Christensen Law Office, P.L.L.C., Minneapolis, Minnesota for The Intellectual Property Institute at William Mitchell College of Law

Description:
Capital Records sued Jammie Thomas-Rasse on a copyright violation theory claiming that she downloaded 24 songs from Kazaa.

Thomas was sharing 24 songs on Kazaa, and the statutory fine can be imposed anywhere between $750 and $30,000 per infringement, with a $150,000 ceiling for wilful violation, aimed at wilful infringers. The court placed the fine somewhere in the middle, at $9,250 per song.

The music and movie industry argues that P2P software turns everyone into a potential industrial scale pirate: turning a home PC into a server farm capable of delivering infringement to hundreds of concurrent users. But the law doesn't require the plaintiff to show evidence of such infringement - they merely need to show evidence of sharing, not quantify downloads

The defenses asserted by Defendant are not available.

Outcome:
Plaintiffs' verdict for $1.92 million.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
Editor's Note: While the Plaintiffs are legally and morally on the right side of cases like this one, they are probably ultimately going to be forced to change their business models to survive. The government can grant copyrights and plaintiffs can use the court of punish people like Jammie Thomas-Rasset for wrongfully using computer technology to download copyrighted materials, but the holders of the copyrights are clearly losing the fight.

About This Case

What was the outcome of Capital Records, Inc. v. Jammie Thomas-Rasset?

The outcome was: Plaintiffs' verdict for $1.92 million.

Which court heard Capital Records, Inc. v. Jammie Thomas-Rasset?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Minnesota (Hennepin County), MN. The presiding judge was Michael J. Davis.

Who were the attorneys in Capital Records, Inc. v. Jammie Thomas-Rasset?

Plaintiff's attorney: Kara Barrow, Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., Minneapolis, Minnesota for Arista Records LLC, et al. Felicia Boyd, Barnes & Thornburg, L.L.P., Minneapolis, Minnesota. Defendant's attorney: Garrett D Blanchfield, Reinhardt Wendorf & Blanchfield, St. Paul, Minnesota Bryan Bleichner, Chestnut Cambronne, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota K.A.D. Camara, Camara & Sibley, Houston, Texas Carl Christensen, Christensen Law Office, P.L.L.C., Minneapolis, Minnesota for The Intellectual Property Institute at William Mitchell College of Law.

When was Capital Records, Inc. v. Jammie Thomas-Rasset decided?

This case was decided on November 4, 2010.