|
Information
About MoreLaw
Contact MoreLaw
|
|
Newspapers Vendors
|
|
GTR Newspapers - Tulsa, OK
Publishing GTR Newspapers - Uinion Boundary, Tulsa Free Press, Jenks Gazette, Broken Arrow Experss, Owasso Rambler, Bixby Breeze
|
GTR Newspapers - Tulsa, OK , OK
Community Newspapers Serving The Tulsa Metro Area
|
The Journal Record - Tulsa, OK
Since 1903, The Journal Record Newspaper has been the best source of Oklahoma business publishing, news and information (Newspapers)
|
Neighbor Newspapers - Tulsa, OK
Tulsa Business and Community Newspapers and Publishers
|
TheLaw.net - San Diego, CA
There's a reason TheLaw.net Corporation starts Year Nine on January 1st.
There's a reason subscribers are gaining on skeptics.
TheLaw.net - www.thelaw.net - delivers a great value.
West and Lexis do not.
The world has changed.
Do you still pay cash for groceries?
Do you still call your broker to check your portfolio?
Do you run home to Katie Couric to find out what happened today?
Then why pay to print?
Why pay to search outside your state?
Why limit yourself to a so-called Plan?
Is somebody maintaining inventory? It's not like there are books involved.
Would you suggest to a loved one that they pursue a career as a law librarian?
The world has changed, but for most, legal research has actually stayed the same.
The truth is that if anything lends itself to the personal computer it is legal research. But, as far as the small law office is concerned West, in particular, continues to leverage its disproportionate market power and economic influence to ensure that the small law office functions exactly as it did in, say, 1960.
In other words, if you practice in Florida, you stay in Florida unless you want to pay a usurious toll to search in, say, Texas. Back in the days of books this was a necessary evil. In the computer age it is simply evil.
Another truth is that if your practice crosses jurisdictional lines or if you simply want the FREEDOM to search across jurisdictional lines, the big guys have nothing for you unless you have a money pile. If you want to do a national search can implicate home equity. It's crazy! And, that's why TheLaw.net is looking a Year Nine.
The success of TheLaw.net has three prongs: (1) more for less, (2) more for less, (3) more for less. Our subscribers are like you. They want to deliver a great value to the client. TheLaw.net has loyal subscribers who:
-Actually prefer TheLaw.net to West or Lexis because TheLaw.net is easier to use, i.e. TheLaw.net is not mind-numbing.
-Stick with TheLaw.net because their practice requires them to search multiple jurisdictions simultaneously and because they are in a small law office, their West or Lexis plan does not include an economically viable solution.
See, http://www.thelaw.net/caselaw.htm
- LOVE that they can search coast-to-coast for $10 a week or LESS!
See, http://www.thelaw.net/subscribe.htm
- LOVE that they can access statutes, rules and regs with a national scope faster.
See, http://www.thelaw.net/statutes.htm
- LOVE that TheLaw.net Virtual Assistant has their back for purposes of fashioning search queries or delivering anything they can't find for whatever reason directly to your inbox - all FREE!
See, http://www.thelaw.net/assistant.htm
- LOVE that the only way they pay us more money is if they renew; no usurious surprises.
- LOVE that their renewal rate is consistently LOWER than what they originally paid for their first year. For example, the annual subscription rate for TheLaw.net Convenience Edition is on sale for $495. But, the renewal rate is just $375! TheLaw.net REWARDS your loyalty; novel concept in this business.
- LOVE that their subscription includes:
--1,200 daily newspapers
--Federal and state statutes, CFR, Federal Register and state administrative codes
--nearly 10,000 Federal and state judicial and administrative forms
--hundreds of executive agency databases
--dozens of bill trackers
--thousands of practice area helpers
--business, technology and legal news at the state and local level
--a remarkable index of the nation's leading columnists and commentators
--a massive reference desk that expedites everyday business tasks
TheLaw.net is an inexpensive, highly effective legal research SYSTEM. From Portland, ME to Miami, FL, to San Diego, CA to Seattle, WA and all points in between you CAN get there from here…using TheLaw.net; all at a price that doesn't require further deliberations! And, there's virtually NOTHING to learn.
So, subscribe to TheLaw.net TODAY, save hundreds, add your paralegal for FREE and find out how great it feels to actually be able to do your job the way YOU want to do it. Once you experience legal research without borders, without chains, without strings and fine print, the big guys will simply look like big stingy guys.
SUBSCRIBE ONLINE AND BE UP AND RUNNING IN FIVE MINUTES!
Easier than booking a plane ticket!
Go to: http://www.thelaw.net/subscribe.htm
Do you still have some questions for us? Maybe you would like us to book your subscription for you. Either way, call in toll free: 1.877.4.LAWNET [877.452.9638}
We look forward to being of service!
Regards,
MARK WHITNEY
President, TheLaw.net Corporation
San Diego - Chicago, USA
Toll Free: 1.877.4.LAWNET (1.877.452.9638)
****************************************************************
PRIVACY STATEMENT: TheLaw.net Corporation respects your time. We believe this advertisement is the fastest, least intrusive method of originating contact with busy professionals. However, we've always provided several free mechanisms allowing recipients to remove themselves easily and at no cost. This message was sent to: verdicts@morelaw.com. To remove this email address go to: http://www.thelaw.net/remove.htm or send an email to remove@thelaw.net and enter verdicts@morelaw.com or call toll free 1.877.452.9638 or write TheLaw.net Corporation, 6640 Lusk Blvd., Suite A208, San Diego, CA 92121.
****************************************************************
FEDERAL APPELLATE COURTS
U.S. Supreme Court 1886
Federal Circuit 1982
D.C. Circuit 1930
1st Circuit (MA, ME, NH, PR, RI) 1930
2nd Circuit (CT, NY, VT) 1930
3rd Circuit (DE, NJ, PA, VI) 1930
4th Circuit (MD, NC, SC, VA, WV) 1930
5th Circuit (LA, MS, TX) 1930
6th Circuit (KY, MI, OH, TN) 1930
7th Circuit (IL, IN, WI) 1930
8th Circuit (AR, IA, MN, MO, ND, NE, SD) 1930
9th Circuit (AK, AZ, CA, GU, HI, ID, MT, NV, OR, WA) 1941
10th Circuit (CO, KS, NM, OK, UT, WY) 1930
11th Circuit (AL, FL, GA) 1981
STATE APPELLATE COURTS
Alaska 1959
Alabama 1955
Arkansas 1950
Arizona 1930
California 1905
Colorado 1930
Connecticut 1950
Dist. of Columbia 1945
Delaware 1950
Florida 1910
Georgia 1940
Guam 1996
Hawaii 1930
Iowa 1927
Idaho 1964
Illinois 1920
Indiana 1940
Kansas 1950
Kentucky 1943
Louisiana 1979
Massachusetts 1930
Maryland 1949
Maine 1940
Michigan 1930
Minnesota 1930
Missouri 1960
Mississippi 1953
Montana 1925
North Carolina 1943
North Dakota 1930
Nebraska 1965
New Hampshire 1930
New Jersey 1930
New Mexico 1930
Nevada 1950
New York 1960
Ohio 1950
Oklahoma 1954
Oregon 1948
Pennsylvania 1920
Puerto Rico 1998
Rhode Island 1950
South Carolina 1950
South Dakota 1965
Tennessee 1950
Texas 1919
Utah 1950
Virginia 1930
Virgin Islands
Vermont 1919
Washington 1935
Wisconsin 1945
West Virginia 1970
Wyoming 1960
FEDERAL DISTRICT COURTS
Alaska District
Alabama Middle District
Alabama Northern District
Alabama Southern District
Arkansas Eastern District
Arkansas Western District
Arizona District
California Central District
California Eastern District
California Northern District
California Southern District
Colorado District
Connecticut District
DC District
Delaware District
Florida Middle District
Florida Northern District
Florida Southern District
Georgia Middle District
Georgia Northern District
Georgia Southern District
Guam District
Hawaii District
Iowa Northern District
Iowa Southern District
Idaho District
Illinois Central District
Illinois Northern District
Illinois Southern District
Illinois Eastern District
Indiana Northern District
Indiana Southern District
Kansas District
Kentucky Eastern District
Kentucky Western District
Louisiana Eastern District
Louisiana Middle District
Louisiana Western District
Massachusetts District
Maryland District
Maine District
Michigan Eastern District
Michigan Western District
Missouri Eastern District
Missouri Western District
Minnesota District
Mississippi Northern District
Mississippi Southern District
Montana District
North Carolina Eastern District
North Carolina Middle District
North Carolina Western District
North Dakota District
Nebraska District
New Hampshire District
New Jersey District
New York Eastern District
New York Northern District
New York Southern District
New York Western District
Ohio Northern District
Ohio Southern District
Oklahoma Eastern District
Oklahoma Northern District
Oklahoma Western District
Oregon District
Pennsylvania Eastern District
Pennsylvania Middle District
Pennsylvania Western District
Puerto Rico District
Rhode Island District
South Carolina District
Western South Carolina District
South Dakota District
Tennessee Eastern District
Tennessee Middle District
Tennessee Western District
Texas Eastern District
Texas Northern District
Texas Southern District
Texas Western District
Utah District
Virginia Eastern District
Virginia Western District
Vermont District
Virgin Islands District
Washington Eastern District
Washington Western District
Wisconsin Eastern District
Wisconsin Western District
West Virginia Northern District
West Virginia Southern District
Wyoming District
FEDERAL AGENCY PRACTICE
Board of Immigration Appeals
Court of Federal Claims
Court of International Trade
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
Internal Revenue Service Revenue Rulings
National Transportation Safety Board
Occupational Health and Safety Review Commission
United States Tax Court
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
TRIBAL COURTS
Chitimacha Tribal Court (LA)
Mashantucket Peqout (CT)
Colville Confederated Tribes Court of Appeals (WA)
Mohegan Gaming Disputes Court (CT)
Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde (OR)
Navajo Nation Court (AZ)
Coquille Tribal Court (OR)
Passamaquoddy Tribal Court (ME)
Coushatta Tribal Court (LA)
Puyallup Tribal Court of Appeals (WA)
Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians (NC)
Saint Regis Mohawk Tribal Court (NY)
Fort McDowell Yavapai Tribal Court (AZ)
Tunica-Biloxi Tribal Court (LA)
Hopi Tribal Court (AZ)
Fort Peck Tribal Court - Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes (MT)
Makah Tribal Court (WA)
Crow Court of Appeals (MT)
|
|
|
