South Dakota Licensee Law
FISCHER v. CITY OF SIOUX FALLS
<center><h2><br> <p style="border:3px; border-style:solid; border-color:#FF0000; padding: 0em;"><br> <font color="red">Morelaw Performance Marketing</font><br> <a href="http://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28012&z=74103&s=OK" target="_new">If It Does Not Work, It Is Free!</a></center><br> On June 29, 2014, Fischer and his grandson were riding their bicycles along a paved pat... More...
$0 (10-26-2018 - SD)16 Jade Street, LLC v. R. Design Co., LLC
This case presents the novel question of whether a member of a limited liability company can be held personally liable for torts committed while acting in furtherance of the company's business. We hold the General Assembly did not intend the LLC act to shield a member from liability for his own torts. <br><br>FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND<br><br>Carl R. Aten, Jr., and his wife are the only member... More...
$0 (04-04-2012 - SD)Pinnacle Pizza Company v. Little Caesar Enterprises
Pinnacle Pizza Company, Inc. ("Pinnacle"), a franchisee, brought suit against Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. (LCE), the franchisor, alleging, inter alia, breach of the corporation's franchise agreement and violation of the South Dakota Franchise Act (SDFA). Pinnacle also sought to cancel LCE's federal trademark for the phrase "Hot- N-Ready." LCE counterclaimed, alleging breach of the franchise ag... More...
$0 (03-22-2010 - SD)Dakota Industries, Inc. v. Cabela's.com, Inc.
[¶1.] Dakota Industries, Inc. sued Cabela's.com, Inc., alleging that Cabela's unlawfully used Dakota Industries' state registered trademark. Cabela's moved for summary judgment, arguing that Dakota Industries abandoned the trademark through non-use. The circuit court granted Cabela's motion, and Dakota Industries appeals. We affirm.<br><br>Facts and Procedural History<br><br>[¶2.] Dakota Industr... More...
$0 (05-20-2009 - SD)Catherine Rose McGuire v. Dean J. Curry and Park Jerferson Speedway, Inc. v. Christopher Eric Mollet
[¶1.] An underage employee, who had unlimited access to his employer's alcoholic beverages, drank to intoxication while at work. After his shift ended, the employee drove his vehicle off the premises and struck the plaintiff, who was a passenger on a motorcycle. She brought suit against the employee and the employer. As to the employer, the plaintiff alleged negligence per se, based on a violatio... More...
$0 (05-20-2009 - SD)