South Dakota Copyright infringement Law
<center><b><h2>State of Nebraska v. Jeffrey Hessler</center></b></h2.
Jeffrey Hessler appeals the order of the district court for Scotts Bluff County which overruled his motion for postconviction relief and denied his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. Hessler claimed that he had received ineffective assistance of trial counsel and was not competent to enter the plea on which his conviction for first degree sexual assault on a child was based. We affirm. <br>... More...
$0 (10-31-2016 - SD)Dakota Industries, Inc. v. Cabela's.com, Inc.
[¶1.] Dakota Industries, Inc. sued Cabela’s.com, Inc., alleging that Cabela’s unlawfully used Dakota Industries’ state registered trademark. Cabela’s moved for summary judgment, arguing that Dakota Industries abandoned the trademark through non-use. The circuit court granted Cabela’s motion, and Dakota Industries appeals. We affirm.<br><br>Facts and Procedural... More...
$0 (05-20-2009 - SD)Richard Jones v. Todd Swanson
<P> Todd V. Swanson appeals the district court's1 order dismissing his motion to vacate brought under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Swanson also appeals the district court's orders denying motions to conduct post-judgment discovery and to designate the real party in interest. We affirm. <P> I <P> Richard M. Jones sued Swanson under South Dakota's alienation of affecti... More...
$0 (01-18-2008 - SD)<a href="http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/04/06/031711P.pdf" target="_new">Planned Parenthood v. M. Michael Rounds</a>
<P>Defendants appeal from the District Court's adverse grant of summary judgment, arguing, among other things, that the District Court erred in holding that hospitals are available in South Dakota for abortions. This was the key to the District Court's treatment of the case, leading, in the view of that Court, to a holding that the South Dakota statute placed an undue burden on the right to ch... More...
$0 (06-21-2004 - SD)<a href="http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/02/06/013425U.pdf" target="_new">Dakota Industries, Inc. v. Dayton Hudson Corporation</a>
In 1972, Dakota Industries, Inc., a manufacturer of snowmobile suits, ski pants, and other outer wear, received a federally registered trademark for the mark “Dakota.” Dakota Industries entered into a licensing agreement allowing M. Fine & Sons to use the “Dakota” trademark on men’s and boys’ jeans. Under the agreement, M. Fine manufactured and sold jeans wi... More...
$0 (06-20-2002 - SD)