Oregon Habeas Corpus Law

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTHONY JAMES HILL </h2

<center> <img width="300" src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/ba/Seal_of_the_United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit.svg/150px-Seal_of_the_United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit.svg.png"> <h2> <h2> </h2> </center> In February 2012, Hill pointed a firearm at a woman during a drunken argument and fled be... More...

$0 (02-13-2019 - OR)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTHONY JAMES HILL

<center> <img width="300" src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cf/Seal_of_the_United_States_Courts%2C_Ninth_Judicial_Circuit.svg/300px-Seal_of_the_United_States_Courts%2C_Ninth_Judicial_Circuit.svg.png"> <h2> <h2> </h2> </center> In February 2012, Hill pointed a firearm at a woman during a drunken argument and fled before the pol... More...

$0 (02-10-2019 - OR)

Jeffrey Dale Tiner v. Jeff Premo

Petitioner was found guilty by a jury of two counts of aggravated murder, one count of intentional murder, and a number of other crimes. He sought post-conviction relief on a variety of claims. The post-conviction court denied relief on all of petitioner’s claims involving the guilt phase of petitioner’s criminal trial but granted relief on his penalty-phase claims and ... More...

$0 (03-01-2017 - OR)

In the Matter of J.C.N-V, a Youth

Youth appeals a judgment of the juvenile court granting the state's petition to waive youth into circuit court so that he could be tried as an adult on the charge of aggravated murder. Youth, who was 13 years and eight months old at the time of the alleged offense, was made eligible for adult prosecution by ORS 419C.352, which allows for discretionary waiver for 12- to 14-y... More...

$0 (01-22-2015 - OR)

Shawn W. Field v. Rick Coursey

2 Petitioner appeals a judgment denying his petition for post-conviction 3 relief. He argues that he received inadequate assistance of appellate counsel when, after 4 his judgment of conviction was affirmed by this court, appellate counsel failed to file 5 either a petition for review with the Oregon Supreme Court or a motion to withdraw as 6 counsel. Because petitioner failed to p... More...

$0 (08-13-2014 - OR)

Bobbi Klutschkowski v. Peacehealth

Plaintiffs brought this medical malpractice action to recover for injuries that their son sustained during delivery. On review, the issues are whether ORCP 59 H limits an appellate court's ability to review objections to a trial court's instructional rulings and whether a statutory cap on noneconomic damages constitutionally can be applied to actions brought by children injured during birth... More...

$0 (09-26-2013 - OR)

Kawi Fung Wong v. David V. Beebe

We agreed to hear this case en banc to clarify whether the statute of limitations in 28 U.S.C. Â§ 2401(b) of the Federal Tort Claims Act ("FTCAâ€) may be equitably tolled. We hold that Â§ 2401(b) is not "jurisdictional,â€ and that equitable tolling is available under the circumstances presented in this case. I. BACKGROUND A. Statutory Background The FT... More...

$0 (10-09-2013 - OR)

Michael Arken v. City of Portland

2 These two cases are before this court on certified appeals from the Court of 3 Appeals. ORS 19.405. Both cases involve the Public Employees Retirement Board's 4 (PERB or the Board) revision or reduction of benefits with respect to so-called "Window Retirees."1 5 These cases involve the Board's efforts to recoup overpayments of benefits to 6 retirees that were predicated on a 20 p... More...

$0 (10-06-2011 - OR)

Dwayne Johnson v. Gary D. Babcock

In this action for legal malpractice, plaintiff(1) appeals, assigning error to the allowance of defendant's motion for summary judgment. As described below, the procedural posture is singular: After plaintiff unsuccessfully sought post-conviction relief based on defendant's alleged ineffective assistance in criminal matters, see Johnson v. Zenon, 151 Or App 349, 948 P2d 767 (1997), rev den, 326 ... More...

$0 (11-10-2010 - OR)

<a href="http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/S53242.htm" target="_new">David Lee Carey and Tanya Maria Carey v. Lincoln Loan Company</a>

Is the Court of Appeals lawfully constituted? Defendant Lincoln Loan Co. argues that it is not, because -- in defendant's view -- the provision of the Oregon Constitution that purports to authorize the legislature to establish courts was improperly adopted in 1910. It therefore follows -- again, in defendant's view -- that, when the legislature created the Court of Appeals by statute in 1969, i... More...

$0 (04-24-2007 - OR)